Re: PATCHES: Countdown for July 3 - 06:00 GMT

2013-07-01 Thread James
Hello, On 30 June 2013 22:40, Mark Polesky wrote: > Hey, why isn't this patch on the countdown list? > https://codereview.appspot.com/10759043/ > > I posted it to -devel here: > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2013-06/msg00252.html > > Thanks. > - Mark > > You'll notice tha

Re: PATCH: Issue 519: Warn about cross-platform font inconsistencies. (issue 10819043)

2013-07-01 Thread James
Mark, On 1 July 2013 03:39, wrote: > Reviewers: , > > Message: > I don't know if this qualifies for a "Fixed" label on Issue 519, but let > me know what you think. > > http://code.google.com/p/**lilypond/issues/detail?id=519 > > Thanks. >

Issue 1337: broken links on gub page (issue 10822043)

2013-07-01 Thread markpolesky
Reviewers: , Message: Graham, this is for you. Here's a patch for the GUB repo. https://codereview.appspot.com/10822043/ Just cleaning up some old cobwebs in the tracker. Can you push it to GUB master and marked issue 1337 as fixed? http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1337 Than

Re: PATCH: Issue 519: Warn about cross-platform font inconsistencies. (issue 10819043)

2013-07-01 Thread markpolesky
On 2013/07/01 07:27:41, J_lowe wrote: And this is why. There has been no label change on this to know that it needs to be tested before it is then reviewed, Fortunately you at least put the tracker number in the summary. So I will go and change that for you so it gets tested. Ah. I

Updates to NR chapter 5 (issue 10813044)

2013-07-01 Thread PhilEHolmes
Reviewers: , Message: Please review Description: My final patch of this set. Mostly formatting niggles. Please review this at https://codereview.appspot.com/10813044/ Affected files: M Documentation/notation/changing-defaults.itely Index: Documentation/notation/changing-defaults.itely dif

Re: PATCH: Issue 519: Warn about cross-platform font inconsistencies. (issue 10819043)

2013-07-01 Thread James
Mark, On 1 July 2013 08:59, wrote: > On 2013/07/01 07:27:41, J_lowe wrote: > >> And this is why. >> > > There has been no label change on this to know that it needs to be >> > tested > >> before it is then reviewed, >> > > Fortunately you at least put the tracker number in the summary. >> > >

Re: PATCH: Issue 519: Warn about cross-platform font inconsistencies. (issue 10819043)

2013-07-01 Thread James
Hello, sorry my typing skills were such I hit return by mistake and sent an incomplete email On 1 July 2013 08:59, wrote: > On 2013/07/01 07:27:41, J_lowe wrote: > >> And this is why. >> > > There has been no label change on this to know that it needs to be >> > tested > >> before it is then r

Re: Updates to NR sections 3 and 4 (issue 10782045)

2013-07-01 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: To: Cc: ; Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2013 8:11 AM Subject: Re: Updates to NR sections 3 and 4 (issue 10782045) Just one comment, otherwise LGTM Trevor https://codereview.appspot.com/10782045/diff/1/Documentation/notation/input.itely File Documentation/nota

The Freeze

2013-07-01 Thread Janek Warchoł
Hi all, it's been a while since we announced the freeze aimed at releasing 2.18. I'm not sure if it's working properly, though: it seems that the development process lost a lot of momentum. (As for the remaning critical bugs, i feel quite incompetent in these areas...) Summer months were usuall

Re: The Freeze

2013-07-01 Thread Mike Solomon
On 1 juil. 2013, at 11:42, Janek Warchoł wrote: > Hi all, > > it's been a while since we announced the freeze aimed at releasing > 2.18. I'm not sure if it's working properly, though: it seems that > the development process lost a lot of momentum. (As for the remaning > critical bugs, i feel

Re: The Freeze

2013-07-01 Thread David Kastrup
Janek Warchoł writes: > it's been a while since we announced the freeze aimed at releasing > 2.18. I'm not sure if it's working properly, though: it seems that > the development process lost a lot of momentum. Uh, why wouldn't the development process lose momentum in a freeze? That's pretty muc

Re: Updates to NR sections 3 and 4 (issue 10782045)

2013-07-01 Thread tdanielsmusic
LGTM Trevor https://codereview.appspot.com/10782045/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Updates to NR chapter 5 (issue 10813044)

2013-07-01 Thread tdanielsmusic
LGTM Trevor https://codereview.appspot.com/10813044/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: remove individual ledger line?

2013-07-01 Thread Mark Polesky
I wrote: > How do I tweak an individual ledger line from within a chord? Well, an hour later, and all I've managed to achieve is printing the staff-positions of the ledger lines that happen to have noteheads on them (to the standard output), and while that makes me feel like a minor genius, it see

Re: remove individual ledger line?

2013-07-01 Thread Mark Polesky
sorry, the last post was supposed to go to -user - Mark ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel