This looks wrong to me:
\relative c'' {
\override NoteHead.style = #'mensural
\cadenzaOn
s1 a \longa a \breve a1 \bar |
\override NoteHead.style = #'blackmensural
s1 a \longa a \breve a1 \bar |
}
--
Phil Holmes
attachment: Wiki1.png___
Phil Holmes em...@philholmes.net writes:
This looks wrong to me:
\relative c'' {
\override NoteHead.style = #'mensural
\cadenzaOn
s1 a \longa a \breve a1 \bar |
\override NoteHead.style = #'blackmensural
s1 a \longa a \breve a1 \bar |
}
There is no blackmensural style as such as far as
- Original Message -
From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
To: Phil Holmes em...@philholmes.net
Cc: Devel lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2013 5:37 PM
Subject: Re: Black mensural notehead bug
Phil Holmes em...@philholmes.net writes:
This looks wrong to me:
\relative
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net writes:
- Original Message -
From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
To: Phil Holmes em...@philholmes.net
Cc: Devel lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2013 5:37 PM
Subject: Re: Black mensural notehead bug
Phil Holmes em...@philholmes.net
- Original Message -
From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
To: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
Cc: Devel lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2013 6:18 PM
Subject: Re: Black mensural notehead bug
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net writes:
- Original Message -
From:
LGTM
https://codereview.appspot.com/14268043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Well, I don't know without further digging. However, there is a notation
style called black mensural, and it seems only logical that Lilypond should
support this using the available glyphs.
sorry for the confusion. I introduced black note heads to support
coloratio in white mensural
https://codereview.appspot.com/8647044/diff/5001/scm/c++.scm
File scm/c++.scm (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/8647044/diff/5001/scm/c++.scm#newcode30
scm/c++.scm:30: (every number-pair? x)))
On 2013/04/23 20:24:57, dak wrote:
Isn't it dangerous to call every on something that is not
https://codereview.appspot.com/8647044/diff/5001/scm/music-functions.scm
File scm/music-functions.scm (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/8647044/diff/5001/scm/music-functions.scm#newcode2103
scm/music-functions.scm:2103: ; head of the alist. We reverse the alist
so our search will return
On 2013/10/04 01:17:08, david.nalesnik wrote:
https://codereview.appspot.com/8647044/diff/5001/scm/c++.scm
File scm/c++.scm (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/8647044/diff/5001/scm/c++.scm#newcode30
scm/c++.scm:30: (every number-pair? x)))
On 2013/04/23 20:24:57, dak wrote:
Isn't it
10 matches
Mail list logo