Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net writes:
On Fri, 13 Dec 2013 23:05:49 -0800, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
That does not make sense. If you want call-once behavior, you can just
use a callback.
At the moment, the decision on whether to preserve the callback
pointer in the grob
On Dec 14, 2013, at 9:21 AM, Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
On Fri, 13 Dec 2013 23:05:49 -0800, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
That does not make sense. If you want call-once behavior, you can just
use a callback.
At the moment, the decision on whether to preserve the callback
On Dec 14, 2013, at 9:35 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net writes:
On Fri, 13 Dec 2013 23:05:49 -0800, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
That does not make sense. If you want call-once behavior, you can just
use a callback.
At the moment, the
https://codereview.appspot.com/40510046/diff/40001/Documentation/web/download.itexi
File Documentation/web/download.itexi (left):
https://codereview.appspot.com/40510046/diff/40001/Documentation/web/download.itexi#oldcode35
Documentation/web/download.itexi:35: @warningTextBased
On 2013/12/14
https://codereview.appspot.com/42190043/diff/1/lily/unpure-pure-container.cc
File lily/unpure-pure-container.cc (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/42190043/diff/1/lily/unpure-pure-container.cc#newcode45
lily/unpure-pure-container.cc:45:
Looking good.
The only thing is - how do we verify
Am 14.12.2013 05:01, schrieb Graham Percival:
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 03:40:03PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
I _think_ the odd place of web in the manuals hierarchy is down to
it being the only part of the documentation that built using make
website - it has something of a split personality
Am 14.12.2013 04:57, schrieb Graham Percival:
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 09:34:28PM +0100, Urs Liska wrote:
When I go there I can download the whole website as a PDF. OK, this
makes sense.
Getting it as one big HTML page also makes sense.
[but where can I get it in info format?)
We don't provide
https://codereview.appspot.com/42190043/diff/1/lily/unpure-pure-container.cc
File lily/unpure-pure-container.cc (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/42190043/diff/1/lily/unpure-pure-container.cc#newcode45
lily/unpure-pure-container.cc:45:
On 2013/12/14 09:47:33, MikeSol wrote:
Looking good.
Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes:
Am 14.12.2013 05:01, schrieb Graham Percival:
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 03:40:03PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
I _think_ the odd place of web in the manuals hierarchy is down to
it being the only part of the documentation that built using make
website - it
On Dec 14, 2013, at 12:00 PM, d...@gnu.org wrote:
https://codereview.appspot.com/42190043/diff/1/lily/unpure-pure-container.cc
File lily/unpure-pure-container.cc (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/42190043/diff/1/lily/unpure-pure-container.cc#newcode45
Am 14.12.2013 11:04, schrieb David Kastrup:
t's not totally clear whether it has other
functions at the moment that could disrupt the regular operations when
removed.
Would be removing it (locally), making a full make website (and make
doc?) and walking through the whole site manually be
- Original Message -
From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
To: Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org
Cc: Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca; Phil Holmes
m...@philholmes.net; LilyPond Development Team lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Saturday, December 14, 2013 10:04 AM
Subject: Re: Website
one nit, patch is in test at the moment before I noticed this.
https://codereview.appspot.com/42070044/diff/1/Documentation/contributor/programming-work.itexi
File Documentation/contributor/programming-work.itexi (right):
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 1:50 AM, James pkx1...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14/12/13 05:57, Carl Peterson wrote:
I have updated the patch in Rietvald
But not the tracker. So the patch will not get tested.
Please remember to either use git-cl or change the tracker to patch-new
whenever you make a
Carl Peterson carlopeter...@gmail.com writes:
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 1:50 AM, James pkx1...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14/12/13 05:57, Carl Peterson wrote:
I have updated the patch in Rietvald
But not the tracker. So the patch will not get tested.
Please remember to either use git-cl or change
- Original Message -
From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
To: Carl Peterson carlopeter...@gmail.com
Cc: James pkx1...@gmail.com; Lilypond Dev lilypond-devel@gnu.org;
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
Sent: Saturday, December 14, 2013 2:27 PM
Subject: Re: Enable manual-specific styling of
LGTM, except one typo.
https://codereview.appspot.com/41990043/diff/1/Documentation/learning/templates.itely
File Documentation/learning/templates.itely (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/41990043/diff/1/Documentation/learning/templates.itely#newcode53
Reviewers: ,
Message:
continuation of
http://codereview.appspot.com/38530043
belonging to
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3705
if requested, I can either update dev/janek/metafont-cleanup or push as
a new branch.
Description:
splitting file movement and whitespace-only
However, if you don't mind, i'd prefer to leave it as is - i have
_already_ spent about 4 hours cleaning up and rebasing commits to
make
them somewhat ordered for review, and i'm quite tired.
I do mind. this is not the sort of thing that can be done in a
follow up patch. If you don't
The only place where it is pushed is when creating a _new_ book, and
then it is cleared out immediately before it. What kind of pushing is
that supposed to be? What does that even mean? A paper block in a book
definition manipulated the top book entry, except when looking at a book
identifier.
Reviewers: Jean-Charles,
Message:
On 2013/12/14 16:15:14, Jean-Charles wrote:
LGTM, except one typo.
https://codereview.appspot.com/41990043/diff/1/Documentation/learning/templates.itely
File Documentation/learning/templates.itely (right):
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 6:32 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
The only place where it is pushed is when creating a _new_ book, and
then it is cleared out immediately before it. What kind of pushing is
that supposed to be? What does that even mean? A paper block in a book
definition
Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com writes:
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 6:32 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
The only place where it is pushed is when creating a _new_ book, and
then it is cleared out immediately before it. What kind of pushing is
that supposed to be? What does that even
This interface is unlike any other in Lilypond, in ways that make it
less flexible and may surprise users:
* It has two separate files that need to be included in the right
places.
* It requires the user to use certain specific variable names.
* The second include file doesn't just add
On Sat, 14 Dec 2013 00:49:43 -0800, Mike Solomon m...@mikesolomon.org wrote:
On Dec 14, 2013, at 9:35 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Most of the contortions seem focused about when or when not and how to
pass begin/end columns. It would seem to make sense to turn them into
dynamic
On Sat, 14 Dec 2013 14:58:52 -0800, Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
Several considered line-breaks might have the same 'start' and 'end' around the
hairpin, but the upper-level axis-group structure caches results for each
start/end pair so just one skyline is generated for each
On 2013/12/14 22:32:06, Devon Schudy wrote:
This interface is unlike any other in Lilypond,
This was intended not as an interface to a built-in bulletproof engine,
but rather a template that users can adopt and change.
Maybe calling it a 'built-in' template, and its attempt to be as general
if requested, I can either update dev/janek/metafont-cleanup
or push as a new branch.
Please do so!
https://codereview.appspot.com/42330044/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://codereview.appspot.com/42330044/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
LGTM.
https://codereview.appspot.com/39320044/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 09:46:54AM +, lilyli...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 2013/12/14 03:51:33, Graham Percival wrote:
Umm, isn't the whole point of this to be a warning? Why are you
removing the
warning CSS tag?
It's the whole point of this patch to raise this information to the
On Dec 15, 2013, at 12:58 AM, Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
On Sat, 14 Dec 2013 00:49:43 -0800, Mike Solomon m...@mikesolomon.org wrote:
On Dec 14, 2013, at 9:35 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Most of the contortions seem focused about when or when not and how to
pass
32 matches
Mail list logo
