Hello
3764
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3764q=label%3APatch-countdown%20OR%20label%3APatch-waiting%20OR%20label%3APatch-review%20OR%20label%3APatch-new%20OR%20label%3APatch-pushsort=patchcolspec=ID%20Type%20Status%20Stars%20Owner%20Patch%20Needs%20Summary%20Modified
On Sun, Jan 05, 2014 at 10:38:04AM +0100, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
I do not believe that there is a notion of package copyright in
most countries' laws.
On page
http://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/html_node/Copyright-Notices.html
I see this:
To update the list of year numbers, add each
LGTM
https://codereview.appspot.com/48430043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
LGTM
https://codereview.appspot.com/48360044/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
LGTM
https://codereview.appspot.com/48450044/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
LGTM
https://codereview.appspot.com/38560044/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
LGTM, thanks for taking care of this!
Note that once this is pushed, that script that updates the pictures in
lilypond-extra git will need to run. It _shouldn't_ require any manual
attention on lilypond.org.
https://codereview.appspot.com/43990047/
LGTM
https://codereview.appspot.com/47900043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
LGTM
https://codereview.appspot.com/47870045/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
LGTM
https://codereview.appspot.com/47890043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
probably ok, but I'm not an expert on .htaccess.
Note that Phil will need to run update security scripts or whatever
they're called. trusted-scripts, maybe. All the steps should be
documented in the CG website section on uploading on security.
Please don't beat me up, but that's something I wondered about for quite
some time:
Is there _any_ notion what a LilyPond 3.0 may be?
I mean 2.0 followed on 1.8, and now we're already towards .20
Is there any general idea about what would make the next major program
version?
Urs
--
Urs
Is there already a clean way to let LilyPond/Scheme code be executed
depending on the version number of the currently executed LilyPond?
If not, would it be useful/acceptable to include something like
Urs Liska writes:
Is there _any_ notion what a LilyPond 3.0 may be?
I could imagine that if LilyPond were made into an engraving library,
and/or heavy rewiring to make it deeply integrated with a gui, or accept
another native input language like the lilypond-driven fixed fresh
release of
- Original Message -
From: Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org
To: LilyPond Development Team lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2014 10:53 AM
Subject: 3.0?
Please don't beat me up, but that's something I wondered about for quite
some time:
Is there _any_ notion what a
Am 09.01.2014 12:03, schrieb Jan Nieuwenhuizen:
Urs Liska writes:
Is there _any_ notion what a LilyPond 3.0 may be?
I could imagine that if LilyPond were made into an engraving library,
and/or heavy rewiring to make it deeply integrated with a gui,
Hm, this is something I was also thinking
Using tt.ly:
\version 2.19.0
\score {
\new Staff {
\set Staff.midiInstrument = #electric bass (finger) % 34
\set Staff.midiPanPosition = #0
a'1
}
\midi { }
}
and midi.pl:
#!/usr/bin/perl -w
use strict;
use MIDI;
my $file;
foreach $file (@ARGV) {
my $opus =
On Jan 9, 2014, at 1:07 PM, Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org wrote:
Am 09.01.2014 12:03, schrieb Jan Nieuwenhuizen:
Urs Liska writes:
Is there _any_ notion what a LilyPond 3.0 may be?
I could imagine that if LilyPond were made into an engraving library,
and/or heavy rewiring to make it
On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 12:07:07PM +0100, Urs Liska wrote:
But it would probably make it more attractive for the consumer
market if it had a nice default GUI. I personally would be pleased
to see Frescobaldi become such a default GUI (of course not cutting
out other options). Particularly
Am 07.01.2014 10:31, schrieb Urs Liska:
Original-Nachricht
Betreff: Re: Images on Introduction and Features
Datum: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 10:30:51 +0100
Von: Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org
An: Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca
Am 03.01.2014 15:37, schrieb Urs Liska:
- Original Message -
From: Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org
However, independently from this concrete image: What is the way to add
new images to the website/docs? I suppose they somehow have to get into
the lilypond-extra repo?
Yes, IIRC. I can do that, as can GP. I don't know who
Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes:
Am 09.01.2014 12:03, schrieb Jan Nieuwenhuizen:
Urs Liska writes:
Is there _any_ notion what a LilyPond 3.0 may be?
I could imagine that if LilyPond were made into an engraving library,
and/or heavy rewiring to make it deeply integrated with a gui,
Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes:
Please don't beat me up, but that's something I wondered about for
quite some time:
Is there _any_ notion what a LilyPond 3.0 may be?
I mean 2.0 followed on 1.8, and now we're already towards .20
Is there any general idea about what would make the next
Carl Peterson:
...
Now, consider an IDE/GUI setup
(perhaps an extension of Frescobaldi) that would allow me to define a
variable for a voice, then pop up a musical staff to enter and play
back the notes for that variable without dealing with the whole
compilation process. No manual tweaking
On 09/01/14 12:20, David Kastrup wrote:
Another problem is that LilyPond has a usage philosophy and workflow
that strongly penalizes manual tweaks. Graphically/manually oriented
workflows detract from the importance of getting good default
typesetting.
I'm not sure that's necessarily the
Joseph Rushton Wakeling joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net writes:
On 09/01/14 12:20, David Kastrup wrote:
Another problem is that LilyPond has a usage philosophy and workflow
that strongly penalizes manual tweaks. Graphically/manually oriented
workflows detract from the importance of getting good
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org schrieb:
Joseph Rushton Wakeling joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net writes:
On 09/01/14 12:20, David Kastrup wrote:
Another problem is that LilyPond has a usage philosophy and workflow
that strongly penalizes manual tweaks. Graphically/manually
oriented
workflows
LGTM
https://codereview.appspot.com/48360044/diff/1/Documentation/web/introduction.itexi
File Documentation/web/introduction.itexi (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/48360044/diff/1/Documentation/web/introduction.itexi#newcode554
Documentation/web/introduction.itexi:554: This is
LGTM
https://codereview.appspot.com/38560044/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Reviewers: Graham Percival,
https://codereview.appspot.com/47860043/diff/1/Documentation/web/server/lilypond.org.htaccess
File Documentation/web/server/lilypond.org.htaccess (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/47860043/diff/1/Documentation/web/server/lilypond.org.htaccess#newcode75
On 09/01/14 21:05, David Kastrup wrote:
That must be the reason why the typical Word document features the
consistent use of document styles for arriving at typographically
superior results.
I'm not sure that I feel happy about your benchmark for comparison. I think
Lilypond's user base is a
dak wrote
Joseph Rushton Wakeling lt;
joseph.wakeling@
gt; writes:
On 09/01/14 12:20, David Kastrup wrote:
Another problem is that LilyPond has a usage philosophy and workflow
that strongly penalizes manual tweaks. Graphically/manually oriented
workflows detract from the importance of
Carl Peterson wrote
I use MuseScore,
Scorio, and Finale Notepad (depending on where I am and how I feel)
for compositional work because they provide ease of note entry in the
composing process and the ability to have instant aural feedback on
what I've written (particularly if I'm not at my
33 matches
Mail list logo
