Patch counted down - Frederic, can you give me a new git formatted patch
(just to make sure it is rebased against current master), and I'll push
it for you.
James
https://codereview.appspot.com/150860044/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
Hello,
Here is the current patch countdown list. The next countdown will be on
October 9th.
You can always view the most current countdown list here:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/list?q=Patch%3Apush%2Ccountdown%2Creview%2Cnew%2Cwaitingcolspec=Patch%20Owner%20ID%20Summarysort=patch
In the lilypond 2.19 installed file
usr/share/lilypond/current/ly/chord-modifiers-init.ly
I see the following at line 27
c es ges-\markup { \super o } % should be $\circ$ ?
Here, instead of ees, is written es.
I've tried this out, and it appears to be a synonym, but I don't see
this
Richard Shann rich...@rshann.plus.com writes:
In the lilypond 2.19 installed file
usr/share/lilypond/current/ly/chord-modifiers-init.ly
I see the following at line 27
c es ges-\markup { \super o } % should be $\circ$ ?
Here, instead of ees, is written es.
I've tried this out, and it
- Original Message -
From: Richard Shann rich...@rshann.plus.com
To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Monday, October 6, 2014 11:12:55 AM
Subject: es means ees???
In the lilypond 2.19 installed file
usr/share/lilypond/current/ly/chord-modifiers-init.ly
I see the following at line 27
c
Richard,
AFAIK, it's not documented, but you can find all available note names in the
file scm/define-note-names.scm, in which you'll find that both es and ees work
for writing e-flat.
Regards,
Abraham
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 6, 2014, at 5:12 AM, Richard Shann rich...@rshann.plus.com
Thank you to all who replied - I didn't think to look in the note names
in other languages section.
Richard
On Mon, 2014-10-06 at 13:41 +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
Richard Shann rich...@rshann.plus.com writes:
In the lilypond 2.19 installed file
I am developing compact chord symbols for LilyPond and have added this
property to define-context-properties.scm
(chordCompactScale ,pair? Draw chord symbols scaled by this
amount)
This works, but I was wondering if there is a more exacting type test
than pair? ?
Richard
Richard Shann rich...@rshann.plus.com writes:
I am developing compact chord symbols for LilyPond and have added this
property to define-context-properties.scm
(chordCompactScale ,pair? Draw chord symbols scaled by this
amount)
This works, but I was wondering if there is a more
On Mon, 2014-10-06 at 17:52 +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
number-pair?
great, thanks!
Richard
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
I have created a patch for LilyPond (following the guidelines in the
documentation). I enclose a file that creates a chord chart from this
version, though I realize that it is too verbose for use in documenting
the new functionality.
I'll be happy to create something smaller if it looks like the
Richard,
On 06/10/14 18:30, Richard Shann wrote:
I have created a patch for LilyPond (following the guidelines in the
documentation). I enclose a file that creates a chord chart from this
version, though I realize that it is too verbose for use in documenting
the new functionality.
I'll be
Developers,
On 06/10/14 18:30, Richard Shann wrote:
I have created a patch for LilyPond (following the guidelines in the
documentation). I enclose a file that creates a chord chart from this
version, though I realize that it is too verbose for use in documenting
the new functionality.
I'll
Hi Marc and list,
On 01/06/14 09:48, Marc Hohl wrote: Am 01.06.2014 08:54, schrieb James:
On 31/05/14 22:44, bobr...@centrum.is wrote:
- Original Message -
From: James pkx1...@gmail.com
To: bobr...@centrum.is
Cc: lilypond-devel lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2014
On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 01:41:30PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
Richard Shann rich...@rshann.plus.com writes:
Here, instead of ees, is written es.
I read
In Dutch, aes is contracted to as, but both forms are accepted in
LilyPond. Similarly, both es and ees are accepted. This
The Smob code is sending me mixed messages. On one hand, it looks like
multiple levels of derivation will not work, e.g. creating a subclass of Book,
because
Book::Book() would call smobify_self() before the subclass constructor runs
scm_gc_register_collectable_memory() would sizeof(Book)
16 matches
Mail list logo