Re: Add means to display objects accessible from a grob (issue 217260043 by david.nales...@gmail.com)

2015-03-25 Thread paulwmorris
LGTM https://codereview.appspot.com/217260043/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Sans-serif free Unicode font (was Re: Ghostscript 9.15)

2015-03-25 Thread Urs Liska
Am 25.03.2015 um 18:58 schrieb Carl Sorensen: On 3/25/15 6:54 AM, "u...@openlilylib.org" wrote: I think the fonts we're looking for should have a similarly classic or old-fashioned look as Century. Maybe we should look for fonts that (optionally) ship with texlive. Hunting around for sans

PATCHES: Countdown for March 28th 2015

2015-03-25 Thread James Lowe
Hello, Here is the current patch countdown list. The next countdown will be on March 28th. You can always view the most current countdown list here: http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/list?q=Patch%3Apush%2Ccountdown%2Creview%2Cnew%2Cwaiting&colspec=Patch%20Owner%20ID%20Summary&sort=patch _

Re: Fix issue 4040: Dots ignoring shifted ledger lines (issue 220090043 by paulwmor...@gmail.com)

2015-03-25 Thread pkx166h
Patch on countdown for March 28th https://codereview.appspot.com/220090043/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Sans-serif free Unicode font (was Re: Ghostscript 9.15)

2015-03-25 Thread Alexander Kobel
On 03/25/2015 06:58 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote: On 3/25/15 6:54 AM, "u...@openlilylib.org" wrote: I think the fonts we're looking for should have a similarly classic or old-fashioned look as Century. Maybe we should look for fonts that (optionally) ship with texlive. [...] I think that the foll

Re: Sans-serif free Unicode font (was Re: Ghostscript 9.15)

2015-03-25 Thread Marc Hohl
Am 25.03.2015 um 18:58 schrieb Carl Sorensen: On 3/25/15 6:54 AM, "u...@openlilylib.org" wrote: I think the fonts we're looking for should have a similarly classic or old-fashioned look as Century. Maybe we should look for fonts that (optionally) ship with texlive. Hunting around for sans

Re: Sans-serif free Unicode font (was Re: Ghostscript 9.15)

2015-03-25 Thread Carl Sorensen
On 3/25/15 6:54 AM, "u...@openlilylib.org" wrote: >I think the fonts we're looking for should have a similarly classic or >old-fashioned look as Century. > >Maybe we should look for fonts that (optionally) ship with texlive. Hunting around for sans-serif fonts that work well with CenturySchool

Re: Add means to display objects accessible from a grob (issue 217260043 by david.nales...@gmail.com)

2015-03-25 Thread david . nalesnik
On 2015/03/25 05:35:28, ul_openlilylib.org wrote: >Well, it's not much code of course. Would it even be reloaded? >Anyway, >I wonder if "redundant" use-modules invocations should be removed, or >at >least reduced to comments. Scheme modules are loaded only once so thee is no overhead involv

Re: Add means to display objects accessible from a grob (issue 217260043 by david.nales...@gmail.com)

2015-03-25 Thread david . nalesnik
https://codereview.appspot.com/217260043/diff/1/scm/output-lib.scm File scm/output-lib.scm (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/217260043/diff/1/scm/output-lib.scm#newcode165 scm/output-lib.scm:165: (use-modules (ice-9 pretty-print)) On 2015/03/24 21:58:28, thomasmorley651 wrote: I always re

Re: Sans-serif free Unicode font (was Re: Ghostscript 9.15)

2015-03-25 Thread Urs Liska
Am 25.03.2015 um 13:32 schrieb Carl Sorensen: On 3/25/15 3:06 AM, "Urs Liska" wrote: 2) Find suitable fonts and include them in the distribution I know this is a more difficult issue than 1) but I think it would be worth it. By default LilyPond scores don't use sans or monospace (IISC) but

Re: Ghostscript 9.15

2015-03-25 Thread Masamichi HOSODA
>> So that’s probably a matter of the font, not of its style - not every font >> defines ligatures, and the name „TakaoPGothic“ tells me its main focus would >> be Japanese (is this true?), so the designers probably didn’t put so much >> work in features of Latin script. >> >> Would you care to

Re: Ghostscript 9.15

2015-03-25 Thread David Kastrup
Masamichi HOSODA writes: >> So that’s probably a matter of the font, not of its style - not >> every font defines ligatures, and the name „TakaoPGothic“ tells me >> its main focus would be Japanese (is this true?), so the designers >> probably didn’t put so much work in features of Latin script.

Re: Ghostscript 9.15

2015-03-25 Thread Masamichi HOSODA
> So that’s probably a matter of the font, not of its style - not every font > defines ligatures, and the name „TakaoPGothic“ tells me its main focus would > be Japanese (is this true?), so the designers probably didn’t put so much > work in features of Latin script. > > Would you care to try a

Re: Ghostscript 9.15

2015-03-25 Thread Werner LEMBERG
>>> Chord names are Sans Serif I think. >> >> A yes, that's right. And IIRC there is sort of an agreement that >> they are not the most appealing part of LilyPond's default >> appearance ... > > Very much so. And if that happened because Pango picks a default > system font, I would not really be

Re: Ghostscript 9.15

2015-03-25 Thread David Kastrup
Urs Liska writes: > Am 25.03.2015 um 10:36 schrieb David Kastrup: >> Urs Liska writes: >> >>> 2) Find suitable fonts and include them in the distribution >>> I know this is a more difficult issue than 1) but I think it would be >>> worth it. By default LilyPond scores don't use sans or monospace

Re: Ghostscript 9.15

2015-03-25 Thread David Kastrup
Urs Liska writes: > 2) Find suitable fonts and include them in the distribution > I know this is a more difficult issue than 1) but I think it would be > worth it. By default LilyPond scores don't use sans or monospace > (IISC) Chord names are Sans Serif I think. > but I think LilyPond should a

Re: Ghostscript 9.15

2015-03-25 Thread Urs Liska
Am 25.03.2015 um 10:36 schrieb David Kastrup: Urs Liska writes: 2) Find suitable fonts and include them in the distribution I know this is a more difficult issue than 1) but I think it would be worth it. By default LilyPond scores don't use sans or monospace (IISC) Chord names are Sans Seri

Re: Ghostscript 9.15

2015-03-25 Thread Urs Liska
Am 25.03.2015 um 09:35 schrieb David Kastrup: Urs Liska writes: Am 25.03.2015 um 09:01 schrieb Werner LEMBERG: We don't use any particular font for sans-serif and monospace. LilyPond simply calls the OS's default here. Which is something I'd like to raise (once more?): Would it be an optio

Re: Disappearing barlines with skipBars - possible bug?

2015-03-25 Thread Mark Knoop
At 00:03 on 25 Mar 2015, Thomas Morley wrote: >I disagree. >\set Score.skipBars = ##t _is_ intended to affect notes _and_ useful! >Don't limit your thoughts to modern music. > >Below I retyped (quick'n dirty) the last bar from Missa Papae >Marcelli, Sanctus by Palestrina taken from an edition which

Fwd: Re: Ghostscript 9.15

2015-03-25 Thread Urs Liska
Sorry, this had accidentally gone private ... Weitergeleitete Nachricht Betreff:Re: Ghostscript 9.15 Datum: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 09:31:49 +0100 Von:David Kastrup An: Urs Liska Urs Liska writes: Am 25.03.2015 um 08:51 schrieb David Kastrup: Urs Liska write

Re: Ghostscript 9.15

2015-03-25 Thread David Kastrup
Urs Liska writes: > Am 25.03.2015 um 09:01 schrieb Werner LEMBERG: We don't use any particular font for sans-serif and monospace. LilyPond simply calls the OS's default here. Which is something I'd like to raise (once more?): Would it be an option to find suitable complementi

Re: Ghostscript 9.15

2015-03-25 Thread Urs Liska
Am 25.03.2015 um 09:01 schrieb Werner LEMBERG: We don't use any particular font for sans-serif and monospace. LilyPond simply calls the OS's default here. Which is something I'd like to raise (once more?): Would it be an option to find suitable complementing fonts here, ship them with LilyPond

Re: Ghostscript 9.15

2015-03-25 Thread Werner LEMBERG
>> We don't use any particular font for sans-serif and >> monospace. LilyPond simply calls the OS's default here. Which is >> something I'd like to raise (once more?): Would it be an option to >> find suitable complementing fonts here, ship them with LilyPond and >> make them the default? > > As

Re: Ghostscript 9.15

2015-03-25 Thread David Kastrup
Urs Liska writes: > Am 25.03.2015 um 07:50 schrieb David Kastrup: >>> So that’s probably a matter of the font, not of its style - not every >>> >font defines ligatures, and the name „TakaoPGothic“ tells me its main >>> >focus would be Japanese (is this true?), so the designers probably >>> >didn’

Re: Ghostscript 9.15

2015-03-25 Thread Urs Liska
Am 25.03.2015 um 07:50 schrieb David Kastrup: So that’s probably a matter of the font, not of its style - not every >font defines ligatures, and the name „TakaoPGothic“ tells me its main >focus would be Japanese (is this true?), so the designers probably >didn’t put so much work in features of