On 2015/07/03 00:54:27, Dan Eble wrote:
On 2015/07/02 12:36:04, Dan Eble wrote:
> I haven't yet reached an understanding of what should be done about
> make-non-relative-music.
After some testing, I understand that make-non-relative-music should
have been
used within \autochange. I've poste
Looks like it's now consistent with the NR saying:
"A \relative section that is outside of \autochange has no effect on the
pitches of the music, so if necessary, put \relative inside \autochange.
"
LGTM
https://codereview.appspot.com/250170043/
___
l
Reviewers: ,
Description:
Both are Grobs, but ties are Spanners and semi-ties are Items. The code
for both cases was jumbled together in many Tie methods. I hope that I
have clarified a few things. No functional changes are intended.
Please review this at https://codereview.appspot.com/251840
Sorry I'm late.
You might still slip in a correction, or just remove mention of
midiChannelMapping='voice since we haven't found a use for it.
https://codereview.appspot.com/249980043/diff/1/Documentation/notation/input.itely
File Documentation/notation/input.itely (right):
https://codereview.a
\relative does its job just fine on the output of \autochange and
\partcombine. The only problem is that \absolute and \partcombine
assume they have been given the final pitches, so applying relative
afterwards messes up the work of \autochange and \partcombine.
So \autochange and \partcombine d
