Actually, the source code is available here:
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/lilypond.git/tree/Documentation/ly-examples
It's been discussed in the past how to make this source code clearly
visible in the website. You can find some discussion in the tracker as
well.
Il giorno mer 27 gen 2016
I forgot to mention that I asked those currently listed as mentors. I'll report
when all have responded.
--
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet.
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://list
Am 27. Januar 2016 02:37:17 MEZ, schrieb Paul Morris :
>> On Jan 26, 2016, at 5:24 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>>> So my question could be rephrased: Would it be acceptable to suggest
>a
>>> GSoC project if such an external library is *not* going to be
>included
>>> in LilyPond directly? With r
Am 27. Januar 2016 05:34:46 MEZ, schrieb paulwmor...@gmail.com:
>Now that ly:one-line-auto-height is in master, this patch set updates
>the docs so it and ly:one-page-breaking are both present and accounted
>for. -Paul
LGTM
>
>
>https://codereview.appspot.com/288910043/diff/1/Documentation/not
Now that ly:one-line-auto-height is in master, this patch set updates
the docs so it and ly:one-page-breaking are both present and accounted
for. -Paul
https://codereview.appspot.com/288910043/diff/1/Documentation/notation/spacing.itely
File Documentation/notation/spacing.itely (right):
https:
Bob,
Not sure why they've been removed, but it appears that there's a new page
that shows some new examples as well as some of those found in the site you
mentioned (source code not included):
http://lilypond.org/examples.html
HTH,
Abraham
On Tuesday, January 26, 2016, Bob Bib [via Lilypond] <
> On Jan 26, 2016, at 5:24 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> So my question could be rephrased: Would it be acceptable to suggest a
>> GSoC project if such an external library is *not* going to be included
>> in LilyPond directly? With regard to the project I'm convinced that
>> this would work out i
Hi developers,
in the past versions, some really nice pieces of music were included in
the docs (e. g., J. S. Bach, E. Satie, F. Schubert):
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/examples
In the current version (2.18), I can't find them.
Have those music pieces been removed from the manuals (and why)?
Am 26.01.2016 um 17:45 schrieb Trevor Daniels:
> Simon Albrecht wrote Monday, January 25, 2016 8:03 PM
>
>> How should I (and James) interpret the silence here? Any more opinions?
> If a user has requested additional characters which have an html character
> (non-numeric) definition and a devel
Simon Albrecht wrote Monday, January 25, 2016 8:03 PM
> How should I (and James) interpret the silence here? Any more opinions?
If a user has requested additional characters which have an html character
(non-numeric) definition and a developer is willing to do the work I see no
reason why they
> On Jan 25, 2016, at 3:03 PM, Simon Albrecht wrote:
>
> How should I (and James) interpret the silence here? Any more opinions?
>
> Best, Simon
Seems ok to me, especially since we have a user asking about these in
particular and they are so common.
If we start to slide much further down th
Urs Liska writes:
> Am 25.01.2016 um 11:55 schrieb David Kastrup:
>> Urs Liska writes:
>>
>>> Am 25.01.2016 um 10:07 schrieb David Kastrup:
>>>
What actual problem are you trying to address here?
>>> LilyPond will consider "C:\\some\\path" an absolute path when compiled
>>> under Windows, b
Am 25.01.2016 um 11:55 schrieb David Kastrup:
> Urs Liska writes:
>
>> Am 25.01.2016 um 10:07 schrieb David Kastrup:
>>
>>> What actual problem are you trying to address here?
>> LilyPond will consider "C:\\some\\path" an absolute path when compiled
>> under Windows, but not when compiled under
How should I (and James) interpret the silence here? Any more opinions?
It would also help ly2video users as that software requires pure 7-bit chars.
Currently I use e.g. "\concat{ W \char ##x0fc nsche } }" instead of "Wünsche".
cu,
Knut
___
lilyp
Urs Liska writes:
> Am 26.01.2016 um 10:21 schrieb David Kastrup:
>> Urs Liska writes:
>>
>> Personally I don't think "integrating ScholarLY" with LilyPond is the
>> right course: it is a rather special-purpose case. I think the question
>> we should rather solve is how to modify LilyPond and i
Am 26.01.2016 um 10:21 schrieb David Kastrup:
> Urs Liska writes:
>
>> Would it be an acceptable/interesting project to bring the ScholarLY
>> library to a finished state and (optionally) integrate it with
>> LilyPond?
> Personally I don't think "integrating ScholarLY" with LilyPond is the
> rig
Urs Liska writes:
> Would it be an acceptable/interesting project to bring the ScholarLY
> library to a finished state and (optionally) integrate it with
> LilyPond?
Personally I don't think "integrating ScholarLY" with LilyPond is the
right course: it is a rather special-purpose case. I think
Would it be an acceptable/interesting project to bring the ScholarLY
library to a finished state and (optionally) integrate it with LilyPond?
As far as I'm concerned and considering the feedback from users this
approach to annotating items in the score is very fruitful. However,
there are so many
18 matches
Mail list logo
