Hello,
Here is the current patch countdown list. The next countdown will be on
February 27th.
A quick synopsis of all patches currently in the review process can be
found here:
http://philholmes.net/lilypond/allura/
__
Push:
4775 Doc: NR renamed New spacing area node - James Lowe
h
https://codereview.appspot.com/279140043/diff/60001/Documentation/notation/input.itely
File Documentation/notation/input.itely (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/279140043/diff/60001/Documentation/notation/input.itely#newcode2319
Documentation/notation/input.itely:2319: \tag #'D { d4 d d d
Am 24.02.2016 um 00:08 schrieb Dan Eble:
> Is this a case where attaching an arpeggio to a chord with ^ or _ should make
> a difference, or do I misunderstand the point of those characters?
That was also discussed in the old thread. Not conclusive but with more
insights than I have:
https://lis
Dan Eble writes:
>> On Feb 23, 2016, at 16:14 , David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>>> I may be nitpicking here, but is there a reason why we should keep the
>>> "www." prefix in the printed URL? The actual website has never
>>> required it (and it looks a bit more elegant without).
>>
>> Sounds reasonab
On Feb 23, 2016, at 16:22 , Noeck wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> I like this a lot and I feel like I've seen this exact discussion
>> before, but it didn't result in any core changes.
>
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2015-01/msg00908.html
>
>> Dev Team,
>>
>> Any reason \arpeggioArr
> On Feb 23, 2016, at 16:14 , David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> I may be nitpicking here, but is there a reason why we should keep the
>> "www." prefix in the printed URL? The actual website has never
>> required it (and it looks a bit more elegant without).
>
> Sounds reasonable.
>
> Ok, this is sill
Hi,
> I like this a lot and I feel like I've seen this exact discussion
> before, but it didn't result in any core changes.
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2015-01/msg00908.html
> Dev Team,
>
> Any reason \arpeggioArrowUp and \arpeggioArrowDown can't be defined this
> way from
Valentin Villenave writes:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 8:00 PM, Noeck wrote:
>> What is the tiny symbol in front of the url? A time signature but why?
>
> Looks like a hack/pun around the © glyph. I like it. (Reminds me of
> http://artlibre.org/wp-content/copyleft2.jpg)
Well, it was also a pun ar
Hi Joram,
> On Feb 23, 2016, at 12:48 PM, Noeck wrote:
>
> As I wrote in my other mail, I would vote to drop the "music engraving
> with" part as it is not language independent and does not provide more
> information (you can probably see from the score that it is about music).
Well, FWIW, I th
Hi David,
> On Feb 23, 2016, at 12:12 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> Paul Morris writes:
>
>>> On Feb 23, 2016, at 8:11 AM, James wrote:
>>>
>>> I might tweak the size or change the text slightly but only that.
>>
>> I like the idea of making the font size smaller, to make it more
>> subtle.
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 8:00 PM, Noeck wrote:
> What is the tiny symbol in front of the url? A time signature but why?
Looks like a hack/pun around the © glyph. I like it. (Reminds me of
http://artlibre.org/wp-content/copyleft2.jpg)
I may be nitpicking here, but is there a reason why we should k
Hi,
>> 1) It is in *English* ...
>
> So let's try cutting it down to something language independent and
> short. Like
>
> 𝄵 www.lilypond.org
What is the tiny symbol in front of the url? A time signature but why?
>> 2) In general such a phrase looks *unprofessional* to me ...
>
> Shrug. Prof
Noeck writes:
> Hi Abraham,
>
> I agree with you. I always change it or remove it for the following reasons:
>
> 1) It is in *English* and would be the only English part in my otherwise
> German score – that looks just unprofessional. That's the most important
> part for me.
So let's try cutting
Noeck writes:
> Hi
>
> Am 23.02.2016 um 15:00 schrieb David Kastrup:
>> I do agree that it should be unobtrusive, but I
>> think that the LilyPond tagline meets that bar.
>
> As I wrote in my other mail, I would vote to drop the "music engraving
> with" part as it is not language independent and
On 2016/02/23 18:07:39, Valentin Villenave wrote:
Access source files only through LilyPond.
It would be nice if we could specify an author/description for each
source file... but as far as I can see, there are a bunch of "not
implemented yet" in Ghostscript:
http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghost
Federico Bruni writes:
> Il giorno mar 23 feb 2016 alle 17:22, Pierre-Luc Gauthier
> ha scritto:
>> I am trying to show (or just explain) my LilyPond/Git/LaTeX workflow
>> to my
>> friends who are fully into music writing; they just don't see it
>> worth the
>> trouble.
>> But when they see the
On 23.02.2016 13:56, Abraham Lee wrote:
In any new score I create, it has become second nature for me to set
tagline = ##f because it gets in the way of the finished product.
In any new score I create, I first do
\include "standard-include.ily"
in order to have all default stylesheet, aliases a
On 23.02.2016 18:42, Noeck wrote:
1) It is in*English* and would be the only English part in my otherwise
German score – that looks just unprofessional. That's the most important
part for me.
Some time ago I made a proposal of having the \language command
automatically translate this and othe
Hi
Am 23.02.2016 um 15:00 schrieb David Kastrup:
> I do agree that it should be unobtrusive, but I
> think that the LilyPond tagline meets that bar.
As I wrote in my other mail, I would vote to drop the "music engraving
with" part as it is not language independent and does not provide more
inform
Hi Abraham,
I agree with you. I always change it or remove it for the following reasons:
1) It is in *English* and would be the only English part in my otherwise
German score – that looks just unprofessional. That's the most important
part for me.
2) In general such a phrase looks *unprofessiona
Il giorno mar 23 feb 2016 alle 17:22, Pierre-Luc Gauthier
ha scritto:
I am trying to show (or just explain) my LilyPond/Git/LaTeX workflow
to my
friends who are fully into music writing; they just don't see it
worth the
trouble.
But when they see the quality of the result, they are thrown away
Paul Morris writes:
> Hi all,
>
>> On Feb 23, 2016, at 8:11 AM, James wrote:
>>
>> I might tweak the size or change the text slightly but only that.
>
> I like the idea of making the font size smaller, to make it more
> subtle. Maybe something in the ballpark of \teeny ...compare:
>
> \version
Hi all,
> On Feb 23, 2016, at 8:11 AM, James wrote:
>
> I might tweak the size or change the text slightly but only that.
I like the idea of making the font size smaller, to make it more subtle. Maybe
something in the ballpark of \teeny ...compare:
\version "2.19.36"
\header {
% %{
tagli
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 9:23 AM, Pierre-Luc Gauthier [via Lilypond] <
ml-node+s1069038n187606...@n5.nabble.com> wrote:
> Might I add,
>
> LilyPond is a rather exotic alternative compared to most other commercial
> project.
> The project as a whole needs visibility to gain recognition.
> Could this
Might I add,
LilyPond is a rather exotic alternative compared to most other commercial
project.
The project as a whole needs visibility to gain recognition.
Could this default tag be seen as a survival feature for the project?
I am trying to show (or just explain) my LilyPond/Git/LaTeX workflow t
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 8:04 AM, Malte Meyn wrote:
>
>
> Am 23.02.2016 um 15:52 schrieb Caio Giovaneti de Barros:
>
>> I'm trying to write a function to make easier for me to change arrow
>> directions in arpeggios.
>>
>
> I would prefer an event function with a tweak:
>
> \version "2.19.36"
>
>
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 7:00 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> "Phil Holmes" writes:
>
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Abraham Lee"
> > To: "LilyPond Development Team"
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 12:56 PM
> > Subject: Lose the tagline (permanently)
> >
> >
> >> Dear Dev team,
> >
"Phil Holmes" writes:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Abraham Lee"
> To: "LilyPond Development Team"
> Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 12:56 PM
> Subject: Lose the tagline (permanently)
>
>
>> Dear Dev team,
>
> [snip]
>
> I'd vote to keep it.
Same here. When people don't mind, it g
- Original Message -
From: "Abraham Lee"
To: "LilyPond Development Team"
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 12:56 PM
Subject: Lose the tagline (permanently)
Dear Dev team,
[snip]
I'd vote to keep it. It's not the only program that does this:
Sent from my iPad=
--
Phil Holmes
___
Hi Abraham,
Am 23.02.2016 um 13:56 schrieb Abraham Lee:
> Dear Dev team,
>
> ...
>
> I'm not sure what prompted
> Han-wen or Jan or whoever to set a default value to it, but I wonder if
> it's time for it to go?
>
> Just some thoughts. I love the quality of LP scores. Removing the default
> taglin
Hello Abraham,
On 23/02/16 12:56, Abraham Lee wrote:
> Dear Dev team,
>
> I don't know if this discussion has come up before, but I thought I'd bring
> something up that's been on my mind. I'd like to propose that we remove the
> tagline variable (or at least its default value). For a while now (a
Dear Dev team,
I don't know if this discussion has come up before, but I thought I'd bring
something up that's been on my mind. I'd like to propose that we remove the
tagline variable (or at least its default value). For a while now (and
spurred on by some recent comments on other forums), I've fe
32 matches
Mail list logo
