On 09/16/2016 01:10 AM, Urs Liska wrote:
Doesn't a conversion to
#`(id . ,(existing-function))
suffice? Otherwise just follow Carl's suggestion.
Hi Urs, Almost, but you have to add a lambda wrapper to pass along the
implicit grob argument, and then there are other more challenging
complica
On 09/16/2016 09:43 AM, Paul wrote:
% is \procE a string or a procedure? No way to tell in convert-ly
% and calling a string as if it were a procedure doesn't work
% \override NoteHead.id = #(lambda (grob `((id . ,(procE grob)
On second thought, I guess the following rewrite would w
Il giorno gio 15 set 2016 alle 22:27, Thomas Morley
ha scritto:
Any hints for a starter?
I'll forward them :)
The documentation should contain all the information needed:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/contributor/translating-the-documentation
In case of trouble there's the maili
% example usage
\version "2.19.49"
targetstaff = #(define-scheme-function
(ctx) (string?)
#{
\set Staff.keepAliveInterfaces = #'()
\context Staff = #ctx { \unset Staff.keepAliveInterfaces }
#})
sopnotes = \relative c'' {
\targetstaff #"tutti"
c1 1 1 1 \break
\targetstaff #"sopa
Reviewers: ,
Message:
This patch allows independent sub-groups to operate in the
Keep_alive_together_engraver. For example, it may be desired to display
four instruments in either one tutti staff, two duo staves (I+II,
III+IV), or four solo staves. By labelling the pairs in this situation,
it is
