LGTM
https://codereview.appspot.com/314300043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Two thoughts, otherwise
LGTM
https://codereview.appspot.com/319150043/diff/1/Documentation/notation/changing-defaults.itely
File Documentation/notation/changing-defaults.itely (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/319150043/diff/1/Documentation/notation/changing-defaults.itely#newcode2522
Do
On 2017/01/23 19:00:43, david.nalesnik wrote:
No problem.
https://codereview.appspot.com/319160043/diff/1/ly/music-functions-init.ly
File ly/music-functions-init.ly (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/319160043/diff/1/ly/music-functions-init.ly#newcode107
ly/music-functions-init.ly:10
On 23.01.2017 22:47, Urs Liska wrote:
So while it's perfectly possible to put OLL projects on the list and to
apply for them (or others not listed there) in case of doubt projects
working on LilyPond itself might be the preference of the developer
community.
[…]
What I would see as a better pro
Am 23.01.2017 um 21:53 schrieb Jeffery Shivers:
> This might be selfish, but how about at least one of those ideas be an OLL
> (or even scholarLY) thing?
I'd like to have others comment on this, but technically this could be
very well possible.
I must admit that I felt somewhat uneasy last year
Hopefully this has simplified some of the examples.
I have made sure that the output after the change is identical (apart
from twp x-11 color markup definitions which I think was a better choice
- see comment below)
https://codereview.appspot.com/313400043/diff/1/Documentation/notation/editoria
This might be selfish, but how about at least one of those ideas be an OLL
(or even scholarLY) thing?
I can't guarantee what the exact status of scholarLY annotations and the
LaTeX package will be by April - therefore I definitely don't suggest a
direct extension of *that/those* projects. (Althoug
>
>PS:
>I've also provided a patch containing a section with recommendations to
>potential students. They draw from my own experience as a mentor last
>year and suggestions discussed both on the mentors' mailing list and
>the
>mentors' summit last year. Please consider these paragraphs too, as
>
Hi all,
GSoC has started and the timeline is proceeding quickly
(https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/).
GNU is going to apply until February 9, and by February 27 I expect them
to be accepted to the program, which will make LilyPond applicable as well.
Students will apply between March 20 and Ap
No problem.
https://codereview.appspot.com/319160043/diff/1/ly/music-functions-init.ly
File ly/music-functions-init.ly (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/319160043/diff/1/ly/music-functions-init.ly#newcode107
ly/music-functions-init.ly:107: (if (or (eq? (ly:music-property item
'span-direct
Reviewers: ,
Message:
Please review. Thanks!
Description:
Let \alterBroken tweak ties again
When tweaking Tie grobs, the music function \alterBroken has
incorrectly rejected them since 2.17.6 as not being spanners.
The method of spanner recognition is at fault: 'span-direction
is not used by T
https://codereview.appspot.com/319160043/diff/1/ly/music-functions-init.ly
File ly/music-functions-init.ly (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/319160043/diff/1/ly/music-functions-init.ly#newcode107
ly/music-functions-init.ly:107: (if (or (eq? (ly:music-property item
'span-direction) START)
T
https://github.com/fedelibre/LilyDev/releases/tag/v5.1
Notable changes in this minor release:
- the setup script at first login is now working again (it was broken
in v5.0)
- all applications now have an icon in the LxQT menu (so the "drag icon
here" hint in the application bar makes more sen
LGTM.
https://codereview.appspot.com/319150043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
14 matches
Mail list logo
