Re: Should we have a from-barline property in analogy to to-barline ?

2017-07-24 Thread Kieren MacMillan
Hi David, > I've got a patch for these. I can post it but it ought to wait for 2.20 to > be locked in. No worries! I currently use the 'outboard' version you made a few years ago, which remains great — but it will be wonderful to have the functionality 'inboard'. Thanks, Kieren.

Re: Should we have a from-barline property in analogy to to-barline ?

2017-07-24 Thread David Nalesnik
On Jul 24, 2017 10:50 AM, "Kieren MacMillan" wrote: Hi Simon, > On 24.07.2017 13:58, David Kastrup wrote: >> Seems like an obvious addition. Would make stuff (like slurs, hairpins >> and so on) starting at the bar move backwards to the bar line. Probably >> also

Re: Should we have a from-barline property in analogy to to-barline ?

2017-07-24 Thread Kieren MacMillan
Hi Simon, > On 24.07.2017 13:58, David Kastrup wrote: >> Seems like an obvious addition. Would make stuff (like slurs, hairpins >> and so on) starting at the bar move backwards to the bar line. Probably >> also useful for non-spanners like a \fermata ? > > I have difficulty imagining use

Re: Should we have a from-barline property in analogy to to-barline ?

2017-07-24 Thread David Kastrup
Simon Albrecht writes: > On 24.07.2017 15:30, David Kastrup wrote: >> Making a bar line an event would then place per-chord articulation marks >> of the following note on the bar line. > > You mean > > { > c1 > \bar "||" > \fermata > \bar "|." \fermata > } > >

Re: Should we have a from-barline property in analogy to to-barline ?

2017-07-24 Thread Simon Albrecht
On 24.07.2017 15:30, David Kastrup wrote: Making a bar line an event would then place per-chord articulation marks of the following note on the bar line. You mean { c1 \bar "||" \fermata \bar "|." \fermata } would place both fermatas on the barlines? I don't think that this idea

Re: Should we have a from-barline property in analogy to to-barline ?

2017-07-24 Thread David Kastrup
Simon Albrecht writes: > On 24.07.2017 13:58, David Kastrup wrote: >> Seems like an obvious addition. Would make stuff (like slurs, hairpins >> and so on) starting at the bar move backwards to the bar line. Probably >> also useful for non-spanners like a \fermata ? > >

Re: Should we have a from-barline property in analogy to to-barline ?

2017-07-24 Thread Simon Albrecht
On 24.07.2017 13:58, David Kastrup wrote: Seems like an obvious addition. Would make stuff (like slurs, hairpins and so on) starting at the bar move backwards to the bar line. Probably also useful for non-spanners like a \fermata ? I have difficulty imagining use cases. Is to-barline really

Re: Should we have a from-barline property in analogy to to-barline ?

2017-07-24 Thread Marc Hohl
Am 24.07.2017 um 13:58 schrieb David Kastrup: Seems like an obvious addition. Would make stuff (like slurs, hairpins and so on) starting at the bar move backwards to the bar line. Probably also useful for non-spanners like a \fermata ? +1 ___

Should we have a from-barline property in analogy to to-barline ?

2017-07-24 Thread David Kastrup
Seems like an obvious addition. Would make stuff (like slurs, hairpins and so on) starting at the bar move backwards to the bar line. Probably also useful for non-spanners like a \fermata ? -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-devel mailing list