Re: Allow use of Identity-H CMap and CID versions of Emmentaler (issue 343970043 by knup...@gmail.com)

Great! But, I failed to build in my Cygwin (case insensitive) environment. I think there is potential confusion where the CID file has no extension, and just has capitalization to indicate it. Is this a standard for CID-keyed fonts? Actually, it is, but I don't see a reason to not use

Re: Microrhythm

On 2018-05-26 04:12 PM, David Kastrup wrote: Arthur Reutenauer writes: I have to correct a post from the other day: In my 30+ years on electronic networks, *this* is the hardest I’ve ever seen anyone work to die on a hill not worth dying on. Hold that

Re: Allow use of Identity-H CMap and CID versions of Emmentaler (issue 343970043 by knup...@gmail.com)

https://codereview.appspot.com/343970043/diff/1/mf/GNUmakefile File mf/GNUmakefile (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/343970043/diff/1/mf/GNUmakefile#newcode145 mf/GNUmakefile:145: cd $(outdir) && mv $(notdir $@).otf $(notdir $@) On 2018/05/26 15:17:09, Carl wrote: I think there is

Let general-column deal reliable with empty args (issue 346030043 by thomasmorle...@gmail.com)

Reviewers: , Description: Let general-column deal reliable with empty args Previously an args-list of empty-stencils issued a programming error: Improbable offset for stencil: -inf staff space This patch removes empty stencils from the args-list. If args-list is empty, an empty stencil is

Re: Allow use of Identity-H CMap and CID versions of Emmentaler (issue 343970043 by knup...@gmail.com)

However, I believe that the case problem with MacOS needs to be fixed. I believe this patch won't work on MacOS -- only one version of the font will be installed (the last one to be created). I wasn't aware of MacOS case handling, I'll have a look at it. Thanks for pointing out that

Re: Microrhythm

Arthur Reutenauer writes: >> I have to correct a post from the other day: In my 30+ years on electronic >> networks, *this* is the hardest I’ve ever seen anyone work to die on a hill >> not worth dying on. > > Hold that thought... Well, that too. I won't

Re: Microrhythm

> I have to correct a post from the other day: In my 30+ years on electronic > networks, *this* is the hardest I’ve ever seen anyone work to die on a hill > not worth dying on. Hold that thought... Arthur ___ lilypond-devel mailing list

Re: Microrhythm

Carl Sorensen writes: > On 5/26/18, 10:44 AM, "lilypond-devel on behalf of David Kastrup" > d...@gnu.org> wrote: > > > Entirely subjective which hill is worth dying on: Güllich was the first > to

Re: Microrhythm

On 5/26/18, 10:44 AM, "lilypond-devel on behalf of David Kastrup" wrote: Entirely subjective which hill is worth dying on: Güllich was the first to extensively exposed hard "solo" routes, with the

Re: Allow use of Identity-H CMap and CID versions of Emmentaler (issue 343970043 by knup...@gmail.com)

lemzw...@googlemail.com writes: > LGTM, but I share Carl's concerns, in particular the issue with font > names that only differ in case. That sounds like a problem not just on MacOSX but also on Windows. > https://codereview.appspot.com/343970043/ -- David Kastrup

Re: Microrhythm

Kieren MacMillan writes: > metachromatic wrote: >>>To see how silly your comment on this issue is, let's calculate the >>> difference in time twixt a tuplet like 7919/4451 against a tuplet >>> 7909/4447 over the course of two minutes

Re: Allow use of Identity-H CMap and CID versions of Emmentaler (issue 343970043 by knup...@gmail.com)

LGTM, but I share Carl's concerns, in particular the issue with font names that only differ in case. https://codereview.appspot.com/343970043/diff/1/mf/GNUmakefile File mf/GNUmakefile (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/343970043/diff/1/mf/GNUmakefile#newcode145 mf/GNUmakefile:145: cd

Re: Microrhythm

metachromatic wrote: >>To see how silly your comment on this issue is, let's calculate the >> difference in time twixt a tuplet like 7919/4451 against a tuplet >> 7909/4447 over the course of two minutes and 13 seconds of 4/4 time at >> a tempo of metronome marking

Re: Allow use of Identity-H CMap and CID versions of Emmentaler (issue 343970043 by knup...@gmail.com)

The patch looks well put together. However, I believe that the case problem with MacOS needs to be fixed. I believe this patch won't work on MacOS -- only one version of the font will be installed (the last one to be created). https://codereview.appspot.com/343970043/diff/1/mf/GNUmakefile File

Re: Microrhythm

On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 8:35 AM, metachromatic wrote: > To see how silly your comment on this issue is, let's calculate the > difference in time twixt a tuplet like 7919/4451 against a tuplet > 7909/4447 over the course of two minutes and 13 seconds of 4/4 time at >

Allow use of Identity-H CMap and CID versions of Emmentaler (issue 343970043 by knup...@gmail.com)

Reviewers: , Message: Please review. Description: Allow use of Identity-H CMap and CID versions of Emmentaler When -O TeX or -O TeX-GS is given, lilypond generates postscript code that instructs ghostscript to use the Identity-H CMap and CID versions of the emmentaler fonts. Used e.g. by 'make

Re: sort input files (issue 347770043 by bmwiedem...@gmail.com)

On 2018/05/23 12:22:09, bmwiedemann wrote: sorting .o files instead of .cc This is not quite what I meant. If it works for you, fine, but I think it is more likely to break eventually than if you found the commands that are being invoked and sorted their arguments. For example, $(CXX)

PATCHES - Countdown for May 26th

Hello, Here is the current patch countdown list. The next countdown will be on May 29th. A quick synopsis of all patches currently in the review process can be found here: http://philholmes.net/lilypond/allura/ Push: No patches to push at this time. Countdown: 5329 Improve

Re: Microrhythm

> On 26 May 2018, at 08:35, metachromatic wrote: > > ... let's calculate the > difference in time twixt a tuplet like 7919/4451 against a tuplet > 7909/4447 over the course of two minutes and 13 seconds of 4/4 time at > a tempo of metronome marking 90: > >The

Re: Microrhythm

> On 26 May 2018, at 08:35, metachromatic wrote: > > ... let's calculate the > difference in time twixt a tuplet like 7919/4451 against a tuplet > 7909/4447 over the course of two minutes and 13 seconds of 4/4 time at > a tempo of metronome marking 90: > > The

Re: Rational

metachromatic writes: If you want an answer, ask a question. Just stating something in the hope that the correction will work as an answer is trying your luck. > >What's the point of asking a question on this forum? The answer > always seems to be: "Go

Re: Microrhythm

On 5/25/18, metachromatic If you really need more resolution for the rational numbers, you could > try to express rationals as int128 fractions, and see how far that > brings you. It should be relatively easy to write (this is a typical > Google interview

Re: Rational

>>> If you want an answer, ask a question. Just stating something in the >>> hope that the correction will work as an answer is trying your luck. What's the point of asking a question on this forum? The answer always seems to be: "Go fix it yourself. Dig into the Lilypond code, and get busy,