> The gs interpreter should not be 9.26. What files are opened during
> the gs run? [...]
Can you show the environment for this gs run? It seems as if
`.../target/linux-64/root/usr/lib' is missing from LD_LIBRARY_PATH...
> -> We either need to change lilypond's code in a way that PATH is
>
>> Yes, 430fcf895a49d8159413f194488b8474d4ae6be6 is also needed.
>
> Doesn't apply either.
OK, so please add 61d42c83db9abf567da0dcabec50df71d56d2bf9, too.
Werner
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
On 23.01.19 22:50, Thomas Morley wrote:
While I agree it has nothing to do with the current problem, it may be
an argument against _requirement_ of extractpdfmark
Though, I'm not familiar with this stuff, I may be wrong.
extractpdfmark saves more than 100 MB of disk space if you only look at
https://codereview.appspot.com/365840043/diff/80001/scm/modal-transforms.scm
File scm/modal-transforms.scm (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/365840043/diff/80001/scm/modal-transforms.scm#newcode324
scm/modal-transforms.scm:324: (sorted (sort pitches
Am Mi., 23. Jan. 2019 um 14:30 Uhr schrieb James Lowe :
>
> Thomas,
>
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 10:58:14 +0100, Thomas Morley
> wrote:
>
>
> > I seem to remember Masamichi-san reported some problems with recent gs
> > and extractpdfmark, I can be wrong here, though. Right now I've not
> > the time
That’s a great idea; I hadn’t considered it. I ought to add it to the
regtest then…
Oh. I’ve just noticed that although it does works with simple \dropNote
and \raiseNote commands, it makes a mess of nested commands (and
therefore \invertChords). I was careful not to overwrite a possibly
Am Mi., 23. Jan. 2019 um 10:58 Uhr schrieb Thomas Morley
:
> I'll redo tests with recent gs-master in the evening.
For completeness, make, make test-baseline, make check succeeds with
gs-9.27 (from most recent master) and extractpdfmark (self-compiled
from the repo)
Cheers,
Harm
https://codereview.appspot.com/365840043/diff/60001/scm/modal-transforms.scm
File scm/modal-transforms.scm (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/365840043/diff/60001/scm/modal-transforms.scm#newcode335
scm/modal-transforms.scm:335: (ly:music-transpose
Shouldn't this also set/adjust the
Il giorno mer 23 gen 2019 alle 12:54, Knut Petersen
ha scritto:
Have a look at
/home/knut/sources/gub/target/linux-64/build/lilypond-git.sv.gnu.org--lilypond.git-master/out/lybook-testdb/snippet-names--3368173372264547087.log
Werner LEMBERG writes:
>>> -> I suspect that stable/2.20 fails because patch
>>> 2c7277e0014b8d1d22ef5a1caa69a2f86bcfb964 is missing ...
>>
>> Patch does not apply (upon cherry-pick) so I guess that this builds on
>> some previous patch. Would we be needing both then?
>
> Yes,
Thomas,
On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 10:58:14 +0100, Thomas Morley
wrote:
> I seem to remember Masamichi-san reported some problems with recent gs
> and extractpdfmark, I can be wrong here, though. Right now I've not
> the time to research. cc-ing him
>
> I'll redo tests with recent gs-master in the
>> -> I suspect that stable/2.20 fails because patch
>> 2c7277e0014b8d1d22ef5a1caa69a2f86bcfb964 is missing ...
>
> Patch does not apply (upon cherry-pick) so I guess that this builds on
> some previous patch. Would we be needing both then?
Yes, 430fcf895a49d8159413f194488b8474d4ae6be6 is also
Knut Petersen writes:
> ===
> SUMMARY
> ===
>
> We have two problems.
>
> -> I suspect that stable/2.20 fails because patch
> 2c7277e0014b8d1d22ef5a1caa69a2f86bcfb964 is missing ...
Patch does not apply (upon cherry-pick) so I guess that this builds on
some previous patch.
Hi everybody!
Below an analysis of lilypond-test problems. strace still is our friend ;-).
Lets start investigation ...
knut@golem:~/sources/gub> rm -f STRACE/* ; strace -v -f -ff -s 1024 -o
STRACE/TP bin/gub linux-64::lilypond-test
calculating
Am Mi., 23. Jan. 2019 um 10:36 Uhr schrieb James Lowe :
> This morning I tried on my work system with extractpdfmark and gs 2.6 and I
> could get a make check to work. Without it (but still using gs 2.6) make
> check will fail.
>
> So the issue is when extractpdfmark is not installed.
Jut
Hello,
On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 21:39:13 +, pkx1...@runbox.com wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 22/01/2019 21:30, Thomas Morley wrote:
> > Am Di., 22. Jan. 2019 um 08:24 Uhr schrieb Werner LEMBERG :
> >
> >> The last command present in both my and your log file is
> >>
> >>gs -sDEVICE=png16m \
> >>
16 matches
Mail list logo
