On 2019/02/08 03:48:31, dan_faithful.be wrote:
So that it’s clear: I have no firm objection to \invertChords. I just
wanted to
make sure that the names were well explored.
OK then, pushed as
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/lilypond.git/commit/?id=0f5c0468117ae09916430ce22140753e9a298799
T
Reviewers: Dan Eble,
Message:
On 2019/02/10 13:36:00, Dan Eble wrote:
It's certainly an improvement.
A user might appreciate seeing the input location in the error
message.
OK, pushed as
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/lilypond.git/commit/?id=88980c4f927bd1f911d66cc5352b4ac73c5eb756
Thanks!
Il giorno gio 14 feb 2019 alle 12:33, Federico Bruni
ha scritto:
Il giorno lun 11 feb 2019 alle 23:42, John Mandereau
ha scritto:
Hi Federico,
I've already tested this setup on Debian 9, Ubuntu 16.04, Fedora 29
(with gcc-7) and reported the errors.
Did you manage to get tools::guil
Werner LEMBERG writes:
>>> ??? What exactly needs Portuguese? Lilypond doesn't, AFAICS.
>>
>> In stable/2.20 here's a translation of the website in this language,
>> and a PDF of the website is built and even shipped in the
>> documentation tarball and the website, e.g. look at the end of the
Werner LEMBERG writes:
>>> I don't have access to a mac, I don't think that I know anybody who
>>> uses one within a 20 miles radius, and my knowledge of MacOS is
>>> almost limited to the single information that it does exist.
>>> Therefore I definitely will not work on 64-bit mac support in gub
Could anyone describe the process GUB uses to produce the current
macOS installer? Maybe at least a starting point for research on
64-bit macOS builds could be determined. Or at a "guided tour" of
GUB sources in this area, to help newcomers to the code understand
what they'll be looking at.
On 13.02.19 18:32, Karlin High wrote:
On 2/13/2019 6:16 AM, Knut Petersen wrote:
"LilyPond's GUB build system is currently being repaired" is misleading: Gub
from grahams repository + pull request or e.g the gub at
https://github.com/knupero/gub.git (grahams gub + pull requests 53-60) has been
Reviewers: carl.d.sorensen_gmail.com, thomasmorley651, dak,
Message:
On 2019/02/10 19:59:36, dak wrote:
>> Simple strings -- don't need #
>
> In markup-mode they do
Not in current master.
Yes; that’s what motivated this proposal in the first place.
Look, putting strings between double quot
