Carl Sorensen writes:
> On 2/24/19, 12:47 PM, "lilypond-devel on behalf of David Kastrup"
> d...@gnu.org> wrote:
>
>
> If libraries with incompatible license would require to be linked, it
> means "nothing" in the sense of "there is nothing we can offer for
> MacOSX".
>
>
On 2/24/19, 12:47 PM, "lilypond-devel on behalf of David Kastrup"
wrote:
Hans Åberg writes:
>> On 24 Feb 2019, at 19:28, Karlin High wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 24, 2019, 7:26 AM Hans Åberg wrote:
>>
>> > On 24 Feb 2019, at 01:16, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>> >
> On 25 Feb 2019, at 01:04, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>>> So the current Xcode SDK very clearly is off-limits for use within GUB.
>>> It's probably either some Darwin SDK or we'll stop providing MacOSX
>>> packagers/versions altogether.
>>
>> US copyright law makes an exception for computer
> On 25 Feb 2019, at 01:04, Karlin High wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 5:48 PM Hans Åberg wrote:
>
> > On 25 Feb 2019, at 00:10, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> > So the current Xcode SDK very clearly is off-limits for use within GUB.
> > It's probably either some Darwin SDK or we'll stop
Hans Åberg writes:
>> On 25 Feb 2019, at 00:10, David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>>> Xcode license:
>>> https://www.apple.com/legal/sla/docs/xcode.pdf
>>
>> Well, I think that one is pretty clear:
>>
>>2.5
>>Copies
>>
>>[...] For clarity, You may copy only the entire package or piece of
On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 5:48 PM Hans Åberg wrote:
>
> > On 25 Feb 2019, at 00:10, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> > So the current Xcode SDK very clearly is off-limits for use within GUB.
> > It's probably either some Darwin SDK or we'll stop providing MacOSX
> > packagers/versions altogether.
>
> But
> On 25 Feb 2019, at 00:10, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> Xcode license:
>> https://www.apple.com/legal/sla/docs/xcode.pdf
>
> Well, I think that one is pretty clear:
>
>2.5
>Copies
>
>[...] For clarity, You may copy only the entire package or piece of
>the Apple Software and
Hans Åberg writes:
>> On 24 Feb 2019, at 21:39, David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>> Hans Åberg writes:
>>
On 24 Feb 2019, at 20:47, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Are there any other considerations here related to software usage
>> rights? GPL v2 versus v3 was mentioned earlier; can
Yes, I believe that’s what we were looking for. Thanks!
https://codereview.appspot.com/361790043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> Yes, I could try to generate the packages and upload them to a given
> place. However, I've never done a lilypond release before, so any
> guidance would be helpful.
I hope the guidance from our Contributors' Guide is as good for this as
it has been for me to get back to
> I got no reply from my last comment on #59, so I went for closing
> it. I merged all others from #53 to #62. I'm not as certain for #61
> and #62 as for others, but I observed no regression with them and
> nobody else commented.
Thanks!
> There are also old open pull requests left, do you
Le dimanche 24 février 2019 à 21:04 +0100, John Mandereau a écrit :
> Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> > https://codereview.appspot.com/363930043/diff/1/Documentation/GNUma
> > ke
> > file#newcode54
> > Documentation/GNUmakefile:54: TEXINFO_MANUALS_BUT_WEB
> > = $(filter-out
> > web,$(TEXINFO_MANUALS))
> >
> On 24 Feb 2019, at 21:39, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> Hans Åberg writes:
>
>>> On 24 Feb 2019, at 20:47, David Kastrup wrote:
>>>
> Are there any other considerations here related to software usage
> rights? GPL v2 versus v3 was mentioned earlier; can anyone provide
> an overview
Hans Åberg writes:
>> On 24 Feb 2019, at 20:47, David Kastrup wrote:
>>
Are there any other considerations here related to software usage
rights? GPL v2 versus v3 was mentioned earlier; can anyone provide
an overview of what that change means for a LilyPond 64 bit macOS
> Please could you confirm which ones can happily be applied - is it
> all from #53 (fontconfig: Avoid access...) to #62 (Enable ... on
> macOS) or a subset?
John already took action, and Knut will certainly comment soon :-)
Werner
___
> On 24 Feb 2019, at 20:47, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>>> Are there any other considerations here related to software usage
>>> rights? GPL v2 versus v3 was mentioned earlier; can anyone provide
>>> an overview of what that change means for a LilyPond 64 bit macOS
>>> effort?
>>
>> Nothing, I
What about "TEXINFO_MANUALS_WITHOUT_WEB"?
IMHO this is much better.
https://codereview.appspot.com/363930043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> https://codereview.appspot.com/363930043/diff/1/Documentation/GNUmake
> file#newcode54
> Documentation/GNUmakefile:54: TEXINFO_MANUALS_BUT_WEB
> = $(filter-out
> web,$(TEXINFO_MANUALS))
> LGTM except this variable name. Could you invent a different one?
What about
Hans Åberg writes:
>> On 24 Feb 2019, at 19:28, Karlin High wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 24, 2019, 7:26 AM Hans Åberg wrote:
>>
>> > On 24 Feb 2019, at 01:16, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>> >
>> > Still needs to download the SDK from Apple:
>> >
>> >
> On 24 Feb 2019, at 19:28, Karlin High wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2019, 7:26 AM Hans Åberg wrote:
>
> > On 24 Feb 2019, at 01:16, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> >
> > Still needs to download the SDK from Apple:
> >
> > https://github.com/tpoechtrager/osxcross#packaging-the-sdk
>
> They are
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> we had some good progress with GUB. However, in the last few weeks
> the development stalled, which is not good. I thus propose the
> following.
>
> * The pull requests as described in
>
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2019-01/msg0022
> 1.html
>
On Sun, Feb 24, 2019, 7:26 AM Hans Åberg wrote:
>
> > On 24 Feb 2019, at 01:16, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> >
> > Still needs to download the SDK from Apple:
> >
> > https://github.com/tpoechtrager/osxcross#packaging-the-sdk
>
> They are listed at
> https://developer.apple.com/download/more/
> One
On 2019/02/24 08:48:22, Valentin Villenave wrote:
I’m still bothered by the way script-interface.cc is written,
specifically the
hardcoded "feta" reference which I tried to address; do you have any
thoughts on
that? (Other than that, it appears there’s very little to salvage from
my patch
> On 24 Feb 2019, at 01:16, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
> Still needs to download the SDK from Apple:
>
> https://github.com/tpoechtrager/osxcross#packaging-the-sdk
They are listed at
https://developer.apple.com/download/more/
One needs to have an account and log in. Mentioned at the bottom at
- Original Message -
From: "Werner LEMBERG"
To: ;
Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2019 6:50 AM
Subject: GUB progress?
Folks,
we had some good progress with GUB. However, in the last few weeks
the development stalled, which is not good. I thus propose the
following.
* The pull
> On 24 Feb 2019, at 01:16, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
> On 2/23/19, 5:13 PM, "lilypond-devel on behalf of Hans Åberg"
> haber...@telia.com> wrote:
>
>Found this, which is for 10.6:
>https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/x86_64-apple-darwin-sdk/
>
> Still needs to download the SDK from
On 2019/02/23 22:40:44, dak wrote:
Sure, but you are trying to override stencils, aren't you? Why do you
even place an entry for "script-stencil" then instead of just placing
an
entry for "stencil"?
Oh. I’ve been an idiot from the start: it simply never occurred to me
that the script-alist
27 matches
Mail list logo
