PATCHES - Countdown for November 30th

2019-11-29 Thread James
Hello, Here is the current patch countdown list. The next countdown will be on  December 2nd. A quick synopsis of all patches currently in the review process can be found here: http://philholmes.net/lilypond/allura/ Countdown Push: No patches to push at this time.

Re: create code tests

2019-11-29 Thread Carl Sorensen
Dan, This is a great explanation. Can you add this to the CG? Anywhere that it seems to make sense. Thanks, Carl On 11/29/19, 3:18 PM, "lilypond-devel on behalf of Dan Eble" wrote: On Nov 29, 2019, at 16:20, wrote: > > I am familiar with the use of makefile. So if you

Re: create code tests

2019-11-29 Thread Dan Eble
On Nov 29, 2019, at 16:20, wrote: > > I am familiar with the use of makefile. So if you can give me directions with > some placeholder commands, or comment at the right place in the makefile (s) Well, start at the "test" target in the top-level GNUmakefile.in. It runs make in a number of

RE: create code tests

2019-11-29 Thread lilypond
From: Dan Eble Sent: Friday, November 29, 2019 4:51 PM To: lilyp...@de-wolff.org Cc: lilypond-devel Subject: Re: create code tests On Nov 28, 2019, at 19:22, Dan Eble mailto:d...@faithful.be> > wrote: Well, step one is to avoid intertwining the existing xml->ly test infrastructure

Re: create code tests

2019-11-29 Thread Dan Eble
On Nov 28, 2019, at 19:22, Dan Eble wrote: > > Well, step one is to avoid intertwining the existing xml->ly test > infrastructure with the new ly->xml test infrastructure. I would put ly->xml > test input in a different directory. I would probably also plan to rename >

Re: Yaffut

2019-11-29 Thread David Kastrup
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes: > On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 8:51 PM David Kastrup wrote: >> > What level of respect should I maintain for the integrity of >> > flower/include/yaffut.h? I think it would be nice to limit the >> > default output of the unit test program to errors + summary, and I >> >

Re: Yaffut

2019-11-29 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 8:51 PM David Kastrup wrote: > > What level of respect should I maintain for the integrity of > > flower/include/yaffut.h? I think it would be nice to limit the > > default output of the unit test program to errors + summary, and I > > could achieve that either by