Harm,
With respect, I'm far from convinced that this is a good idea, but I
will continue to think about it. Thoughts so far:
* The user provides music for the appearance of the mark at the
beginning or end of a line, but can he control what happens in the
middle? They seem to stack
On 2019/12/07 22:44:16, thomasmorley651 wrote:
In one of your linked patches, you define a new grob, DepartureMark. I
already
thought about something along these lines: we currently have
MetronomeMark and
RehearsalMark, a new one accepting text only wouldn't be wrong. Though
I'd
called it
On 2019/12/11 07:17:30, hahnjo wrote:
On 2019/12/10 22:28:46, Dan Eble wrote:
> I don't know if the compiler that GUB uses properly supports C++11,
> and I'm not yet interested in spending my own time to investigate.
GUB builds GCC 4.9.4 which is fine for C++11.
That depends on your
Hello,
Here is the current patch countdown list. The next countdown will be on
December 13th.
A quick synopsis of all patches currently in the review process can be
found here:
http://philholmes.net/lilypond/allura/
Push:
5630 use alt="" in regtest HTML to appease tidy 5.2.0
Is there a major benefit from using C++14? Not saying
that I wouldn't be in favor, but if we can get C++11
for free...
C++14 is definitely too new. For example, TeXLive is going to replace
the poppler library with another library written in C because poppler
requires C++14, which too many
