Flaming Hakama by Elaine writes:
>> -- Forwarded message --
>> From: d...@gnu.org
>> To: v.villen...@gmail.com
>> Cc: lilypond-devel@gnu.org, re...@codereview-hr.appspotmail.com
>> Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2020 14:06:51 -0800
>> Subject: Re: Chord names clean-up; no more Banter, exceptio
Am 7. Januar 2020 23:53:42 MEZ schrieb Andrew Bernard
:
>Hi Malte,
>
>\shapeII is a function I use heavily - heavily - in all my work. It's
>indispensable for me at least. I'm very familiar with OpenLilyLib, and
>contribute a bit to it, so it's not an issue for me, but that's a
>function that r
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: d...@gnu.org
> To: v.villen...@gmail.com
> Cc: lilypond-devel@gnu.org, re...@codereview-hr.appspotmail.com
> Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2020 14:06:51 -0800
> Subject: Re: Chord names clean-up; no more Banter, exceptionsPartial or
> \powerChords. (issue 36388
> On 7 Jan 2020, at 23:21, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote:
>
>>> Also, of course, the point is to do this in a way that doesn’t require
>> the end users to have MacPorts.
>>
>> The Emacs.app seemed to be working when put in /Applications/ so it might
>> be distributed independently.
>
> Right, unl
On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 5:58 PM Carl Sorensen wrote:
[...]
> Here's a discussion about how to create a MacOS app bundle for Gnu Octave
> based on a MacPorts build similar to Hans's.
>
> I haven't worked through it, but I thought it might be a useful guide. In
> particular, there is a shell script
On 1/7/20, 3:22 PM, "lilypond-devel on behalf of Marnen Laibow-Koser"
wrote:
On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 5:15 PM Hans Åberg wrote:
>
> > On 7 Jan 2020, at 22:20, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 4:16 PM Hans Åberg wrote:
> > [...]
> >
Hi Malte,
\shapeII is a function I use heavily - heavily - in all my work. It's
indispensable for me at least. I'm very familiar with OpenLilyLib, and
contribute a bit to it, so it's not an issue for me, but that's a
function that really ought to go into lilypond core in my view.
As for newbies n
On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 5:15 PM Hans Åberg wrote:
>
> > On 7 Jan 2020, at 22:20, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 4:16 PM Hans Åberg wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > FYI, it is possible to build apps using MacPorts, for example, there is
> emacs-app that installs Emacs.app in /A
> On 7 Jan 2020, at 22:35, Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond
> development wrote:
>
> By far no Mac expert, but if dynamic libraries are problematic would it
> help to have a static executable? I experimented with such a setup for
> Linux, and I eventually got it to build. Not sure wh
> On 7 Jan 2020, at 22:20, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 4:16 PM Hans Åberg wrote:
> [...]
>
> FYI, it is possible to build apps using MacPorts, for example, there is
> emacs-app that installs Emacs.app in /Applications/MacPorts/, and it seems
> working if copied out
https://codereview.appspot.com/363880043/diff/80001/python/convertrules.py
File python/convertrules.py (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/363880043/diff/80001/python/convertrules.py#newcode3980
python/convertrules.py:3980: if re.search
(r"#[banter|jazz]-chord-names", str):
I have no idea w
On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 4:35 PM Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
[...]
> By far no Mac expert, but if dynamic libraries are problematic would it
> help to have a static executable?
Maybe. If I understand correctly, though, .app bundles are *designed* to
easily contain dylibs, frameworks, and other depende
Am Dienstag, den 07.01.2020, 15:52 -0500 schrieb Marnen Laibow-Koser:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 7:08 PM Marnen Laibow-Koser <
> mar...@marnen.org
> >
> wrote:
>
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 6:52 PM Hans Åberg <
> > haber...@telia.com
> > > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > > On 18 Oct 2019, at 00:30, M
On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 4:16 PM Hans Åberg wrote:
[...]
>
> FYI, it is possible to build apps using MacPorts, for example, there is
> emacs-app that installs Emacs.app in /Applications/MacPorts/, and it seems
> working if copied out of that directory.
Thanks, I looked for something like that but
> On 7 Jan 2020, at 21:52, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote:
>
> Some updates. For the time being, at least, I've changed approaches.
> Since I couldn't understand much of GUB's OS detection logic, and no one
> seemed able to help with that, I abandoned GUB entirely for my latest
> attempt and used M
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 7:08 PM Marnen Laibow-Koser
wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 6:52 PM Hans Åberg wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> > On 18 Oct 2019, at 00:30, Marnen Laibow-Koser
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 6:24 PM Hans Åberg wrote:
>> >
>> >> I made an installer into /opt/lilypond/
Hello,
Here is the current patch countdown list. The next countdown will be on
January 9th.
A quick synopsis of all patches currently in the review process can be
found here:
http://philholmes.net/lilypond/allura/
Push:
5650 Use C++11 "override" keyword - Dan Eble
https://sourcefo
Am Dienstag, den 07.01.2020, 20:24 +0100 schrieb David Kastrup:
> David Kastrup <
> d...@gnu.org
> > writes:
>
> > Werner LEMBERG <
> > w...@gnu.org
> > > writes:
> >
> > > This looks interesting!
> > >
> > >
> > > https://lgtm.com/projects/g/lilypond/lilypond
> > >
> >
> > I'll agree that
David Kastrup writes:
> Werner LEMBERG writes:
>
>> This looks interesting!
>>
>> https://lgtm.com/projects/g/lilypond/lilypond
>
> I'll agree that a number of those (not all) look worth changing.
I'll go through some.
--
David Kastrup
Werner LEMBERG writes:
> This looks interesting!
>
> https://lgtm.com/projects/g/lilypond/lilypond
I'll agree that a number of those (not all) look worth changing.
--
David Kastrup
This looks interesting!
https://lgtm.com/projects/g/lilypond/lilypond
Werner
On Jan 7, 2020, at 09:26, Dan Eble wrote:
>
> On Jan 6, 2020, at 17:01, David Kastrup wrote:
>>
If I write
<< \new Staff { c' } \new Voice { d' } >>
should the d' insinuate itself into the same staff as the c' ?
>>>
>>> You didn't specify a staff for the d', so I don
On Jan 6, 2020, at 17:01, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>>> If I write
>>>
>>> << \new Staff { c' } \new Voice { d' } >>
>>>
>>> should the d' insinuate itself into the same staff as the c' ?
>>
>> You didn't specify a staff for the d', so I don't see grounds for
>> dissatisfaction if LilyPond were t
23 matches
Mail list logo
