German and English successfully tested.
proposal for espanol (missing quarter notes) and portuques (still
completely missing) added (as it is about 2.20)
https://codereview.appspot.com/547610043/
On 2020/02/11 20:54:19, dak wrote:
>
https://codereview.appspot.com/547610043/diff/557380043/python/musicexp.py
> File python/musicexp.py (right):
>
>
https://codereview.appspot.com/547610043/diff/557380043/python/musicexp.py#newcode324
> python/musicexp.py:324: return str
> On 2020/02/11 20:39:14
> LGTM.
And I think this can be directly pushed.
https://codereview.appspot.com/567220044/
LGTM.
https://codereview.appspot.com/567220044/
Guess a full test cycle for this one would be excessive. As far as I am
concerned, feel free to push this one.
https://codereview.appspot.com/565640043/
https://codereview.appspot.com/581630043/diff/563520043/Documentation/included/compile.itexi
File Documentation/included/compile.itexi (left):
https://codereview.appspot.com/581630043/diff/563520043/Documentation/included/compile.itexi#oldcode895
Documentation/included/compile.itexi:895: @node C
Oh no! I was using this just this week for GUILE2 vs GUILE1.8
(but OK to remove, I agree it is too baroque).
https://codereview.appspot.com/581630043/
Urs Liska writes:
> I just told them to copy last year's proposal, which basically links to *our*
> GSoC page.
Thanks.
--
David Kastrup
My replies have a tendency to cause friction. To help mitigating
damage, feel free to forward problematic posts to me adding a subject
like "timeout 1d" (fo
I just told them to copy last year's proposal, which basically links to *our*
GSoC page.
Urs
Am 12. Februar 2020 20:03:49 MEZ schrieb David Kastrup :
>
>Someone with a good idea?
>
> Start of forwarded message
>From: jema...@gnu.org (Jose E. Marchesi)
>To
Someone with a good idea?
Start of forwarded message
From: jema...@gnu.org (Jose E. Marchesi)
To: gnu-prog-disc...@gnu.org
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 19:50:06 +0100
Subject: [gnu-prog-discuss] [VERY URGENT] GNU ideas for GSOC 2020
Hi people!
Once again, w
I really like the work. I just wonder if we should eliminate the
instructions on how to achieve the objective.
https://codereview.appspot.com/581630043/diff/563520043/Documentation/included/compile.itexi
File Documentation/included/compile.itexi (left):
https://codereview.appspot.com/581630043/
LGTM, thanks!
https://codereview.appspot.com/581630043/
Hello,
Here is the current patch countdown list. The next countdown will be on
February 14th.
A quick synopsis of all patches currently in the review process can be
found here:
http://philholmes.net/lilypond/allura/ [1]
***
PUSH:
5745 GUILE2: softcode GC environment tuning - Han-Wen
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot.
A revised PO file for textual domain 'lilypond' has been submitted
by the Spanish team of translators. The file is available at:
https://translationproject.org/latest/lilypond/es.po
(We can arrange things so th
https://codereview.appspot.com/557410043/diff/545570043/lily/parser.yy
File lily/parser.yy (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/557410043/diff/545570043/lily/parser.yy#newcode3676
lily/parser.yy:3676: | pitch exclamations questions octave_check
duration stray_quotes optional_rest post_events
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 10:17 PM David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> > the reason being that it is better if the source code looks like plain
>> C++,
>> > even though they might actually be macros that do advanced magic. Having
>> > normal looking source code helps editors and t
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot.
A revised PO file for textual domain 'lilypond' has been submitted
by the Dutch team of translators. The file is available at:
https://translationproject.org/latest/lilypond/nl.po
(We can arrange things so that
17 matches
Mail list logo