Fixes for cross-compilation to x86_64-w64-mingw32 (issue 579340043 by jonas.hahnf...@gmail.com)

2020-02-27 Thread lemzwerg--- via Discussions on LilyPond development
LGTM https://codereview.appspot.com/579340043/

aclocal.m4: also recognize guile2.2 (issue 555370043 by hanw...@gmail.com)

2020-02-27 Thread lemzwerg--- via Discussions on LilyPond development
LGTM. https://codereview.appspot.com/555370043/

Re: testing out Docker CI scripts?

2020-02-27 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes: > On Sun, Feb 23, 2020 at 4:50 PM Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > >> It looks like the scripts are working though, and we're now looking at a >> picnic here ;-) -- so just ping me if you want me to test something. > > can you try again? The GUILE2 patch now has hit master. > >

Re: [translations] Our language downloads are chaotic.

2020-02-27 Thread David Kastrup
David Kastrup writes: > Han-Wen Nienhuys writes: > >> On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 4:17 PM David Kastrup wrote: >> >>> Does anybody have a better idea than that? >> >> couldn't we rename the localized downloads as >> >> notation_de.pdf >> >> and then link to them explicitly? I think linking expli

Re: [translations] Our language downloads are chaotic.

2020-02-27 Thread David Kastrup
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes: > On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 4:17 PM David Kastrup wrote: > >> Does anybody have a better idea than that? > > couldn't we rename the localized downloads as > > notation_de.pdf > > and then link to them explicitly? We have in Documentation/web/server/lilypond.org.htaccess

Re: [translations] Our language downloads are chaotic.

2020-02-27 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 4:17 PM David Kastrup wrote: > Does anybody have a better idea than that? couldn't we rename the localized downloads as notation_de.pdf and then link to them explicitly? -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - hanw...@gmail.com - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen

Re: [GSOC 2020] Discussing GNU Lilypond project ideas?

2020-02-27 Thread David Kastrup
Leandro Doctors writes: > On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 at 18:56, Urs Liska wrote: >> I'd like to stress that the GSoC page lists >> project *ideas*, and if you're specifically interested in Scheme stuff >> you may as well suggest other topics than listed there. > > Sure, Urs :-) > > As I said before, I h

Re: Remove OMF support (issue 545630044 by hanw...@gmail.com)

2020-02-27 Thread jonas . hahnfeld
LGTM https://codereview.appspot.com/545630044/

Re: [translations] Our language downloads are chaotic.

2020-02-27 Thread David Kastrup
Federico Bruni writes: > Il giorno gio 27 feb 2020 alle 02:10, David Kastrup ha > scritto: >> For example, try downloading any French documentation from >> if >> your browser locale is not French. Possibly even if it is. >> > >

Re: [translations] Our language downloads are chaotic.

2020-02-27 Thread Federico Bruni
Il giorno gio 27 feb 2020 alle 02:10, David Kastrup ha scritto: For example, try downloading any French documentation from if your browser locale is not French. Possibly even if it is. I am currently setting up the size

Re: [GSOC 2020] Discussing GNU Lilypond project ideas?

2020-02-27 Thread Leandro Doctors
On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 at 10:59, Urs Liska wrote: > You may also be interested in openLilyLib (https://openlilylib.org for > a very-WIP introdcution and https://github.com/openlilylib for the > development space. There is much room for Scheme work in there, if it > looks interesting to start with I s

Re: [GSOC 2020] Discussing GNU Lilypond project ideas?

2020-02-27 Thread Urs Liska
Am Donnerstag, den 27.02.2020, 08:57 -0300 schrieb Leandro Doctors: > On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 at 18:56, Urs Liska > wrote: > > I'd like to stress that the GSoC page lists > > project *ideas*, and if you're specifically interested in Scheme > > stuff > > you may as well suggest other topics than listed

Re: [GSOC 2020] Discussing GNU Lilypond project ideas?

2020-02-27 Thread Leandro Doctors
On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 at 18:56, Urs Liska wrote: > I'd like to stress that the GSoC page lists > project *ideas*, and if you're specifically interested in Scheme stuff > you may as well suggest other topics than listed there. Sure, Urs :-) As I said before, I have only started reading the Ideas pa

Re: testing out Docker CI scripts?

2020-02-27 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
On Sun, Feb 23, 2020 at 4:50 PM Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > It looks like the scripts are working though, and we're now looking at a > picnic here ;-) -- so just ping me if you want me to test something. can you try again? The GUILE2 patch now has hit master. I also did some fixes to the scripts

Re: Allow parallelism in input/regression/lilypond-book/ (issue 547680043 by hanw...@gmail.com)

2020-02-27 Thread hanwenn
superseeded by https://codereview.appspot.com/555360043/ https://codereview.appspot.com/547680043/

Re: Forge Software Evaluation by FSF

2020-02-27 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 11:50 PM David Kastrup wrote: > > It's also useful for tracking downloads. > > But for that it is not necessary to know the IP addresses. And we > likely don't. We certainly do. They are stored in the Apache server logs on the lilypond.org site. > But employing Google's

Re: How to report `FontForge` problems while creating LilyPond fonts

2020-02-27 Thread Torsten Hämmerle
Werner LEMBERG wrote > Yes, and avoiding overlaps everywhere would lead to unnecessarily > complicated code. Tools like FontForge should be used to fix this in > a post-processing stage, exactly as we do. I totally agree. I'm going to fix the cases giving an error. "Don't fix it if it ain't broke

Re: How to report `FontForge` problems while creating LilyPond fonts

2020-02-27 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> Unfortunately, mf overlaps can hardly be avoided in many cases, > because lots of glyphs are being composed out of several overlapping > predefined components. Yes, and avoiding overlaps everywhere would lead to unnecessarily complicated code. Tools like FontForge should be used to fix this i