Is this \mask function worth developing as a feature of LilyPond? Is there
already something that can achieve this that I am overlooking?
The use case will probably be clearer if you start by running this example
through LilyPond than if you start by reading the code.
Regards,
—
Dan
\version
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 6:01 PM wrote:
>
>> > I disagree David's assessment on several theoretical grounds too:
>> >
>> > * "less maintainable manner with hand-written optimisations". I don't
>> > see these in this patch. This (together with the Tie_performer) is the
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 6:01 PM wrote:
> > I disagree David's assessment on several theoretical grounds too:
> >
> > * "less maintainable manner with hand-written optimisations". I don't
> > see these in this patch. This (together with the Tie_performer) is the
> > only place in LilyPond that
Il giorno gio 23 apr 2020 alle 16:01, Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on
LilyPond development ha scritto:
Am Donnerstag, den 23.04.2020, 13:37 + schrieb Valentin Villenave:
Hey everybody,
For the past few days, I’ve been unable to make doc because of the
following error:
*** No
Am Donnerstag, den 23.04.2020, 22:04 +0200 schrieb Thomas Morley:
> Am Mi., 22. Apr. 2020 um 12:50 Uhr schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld :
> > I've run the migration script last night (~9h) and will now do some
> > post-processing. I'll keep all of you posted once we can start.
> >
> > Jonas
>
> Hi Jonas,
Am Mi., 22. Apr. 2020 um 12:50 Uhr schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld :
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 22.04.2020, 10:31 +0100 schrieb James Lowe:
> > On 21/04/2020 18:54, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
> > > Am Mittwoch, den 15.04.2020, 21:15 +0200 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld:
> > > > With 2.21.0 done, I'd like to restart
> here we go: https://gitlab.com/lilypond-issues/lilypond-trial
Very nice, thanks!
Werner
On 4/23/20, 12:11 PM, "Jonas Hahnfeld" wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 23.04.2020, 17:26 + schrieb Carl Sorensen:
> As I was reviewing Jonas's test review environment on GitLab, I noticed that
> there were tons of closed issues that had not been verified.
>
> I went back and looked on
Am Donnerstag, den 23.04.2020, 17:03 + schrieb Carl Sorensen:
> Sending it only to you was not intended. I must have hit reply instead of
> reply-all, and I didn't notice it. I'm sorry!
>
> I guess I'm being lazy right now. I don't have a good lilypond development
> environment set up
Am Donnerstag, den 23.04.2020, 17:26 + schrieb Carl Sorensen:
> As I was reviewing Jonas's test review environment on GitLab, I noticed that
> there were tons of closed issues that had not been verified.
>
> I went back and looked on SourceForge, and found that we have 587 issues that
> are
On 2020/04/23 16:01:20, dak wrote:
> On 2020/04/22 07:43:17, hanwenn wrote:
> > * The linked list has an overhead of 2 pointers, on a 4x Real
> > datastructure, ie. 50% overhead.
By the way: C++11 has Forward_list which would be another plugin
container type with less overhead.
I actually have
On Thursday, April 23, 2020, Carl Sorensen wrote:.
>
> Do you believe we should Verify the fixes, or should we just leave the
> issues closed without verification? I'm willing to spend some time doing
> the verification, if we think it's valuable to do so.
>
I'm available to help with that as
As I was reviewing Jonas's test review environment on GitLab, I noticed that
there were tons of closed issues that had not been verified.
I went back and looked on SourceForge, and found that we have 587 issues that
are listed with status of Fixed and do not have the label Fixed_2_21_1 (which
Sending it only to you was not intended. I must have hit reply instead of
reply-all, and I didn't notice it. I'm sorry!
I guess I'm being lazy right now. I don't have a good lilypond development
environment set up right now, so I don't have any merge requests to send. I
guess I could just
Thanks Carl and sorry for late response.
I tried but it still throws back the same result.
###
ERROR: Please install required programs: /opt/local/bin/fontforge >= 20110222
(installed: )
Note that FontForge is indeed installed with more up-to-date version.
Jajas-MacBook-Pro:build jajaman$ port
On 2020/04/22 07:43:17, hanwenn wrote:
> current master:
>
> 4f906b95aea99f2a47d5ba037f7421e5bb933c42 (origin/master) Issue 5908:
> get_path_list: use loop instead of tail recursion
>
> Command being timed: "out/bin/lilypond.4f906b95ae -I carver MSDM"
> User time (seconds): 34.30
> Maximum
Am Donnerstag, den 23.04.2020, 13:37 + schrieb Valentin Villenave:
> Hey everybody,
> For the past few days, I’ve been unable to make doc because of the
> following error:
>
> *** No rule to make target
> '/home/work/lilypond/Documentation/it/web/news-headlines.itexi',
> needed by
Hey everybody,
For the past few days, I’ve been unable to make doc because of the
following error:
*** No rule to make target
'/home/work/lilypond/Documentation/it/web/news-headlines.itexi',
needed by 'out-www/web.texi'. Stop.
Federico, do you know anything about it?
Cheers,
V.
Am 22.04.2020 um 22:16 schrieb fedel...@gmail.com:
On 2020/04/21 16:24:47, michael.kaeppler wrote:
Hope this is the right way to submit translation fixes. Any advice is
appreciated.
I think goin' through Rietveld is overkill in this case.
You'd better send a git formatted patch to
Hello,
Here is the current patch countdown list. The next countdown will be on
April 25th
A quick synopsis of all patches currently in the review process can be
found here:
http://philholmes.net/lilypond/allura/
***
Push:
5918 stepmake: Remove unused tex template - Jonas
20 matches
Mail list logo
