On 2020/04/25 22:05:26, dak wrote:
> On 2020/04/25 17:07:17, hahnjo wrote:
> > I strongly object to adding more random scripts to the source tree.
There are
> > already far too many unmaintained in scripts/auxiliar/ with no
documentation
> at
> > all.
>
> How about approaching this in a different
On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 9:42 PM Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> There are two: TrueType and PostScript, which are exactly the
> opposite. However, all glyphs in a font have the same orientation, so
> this should be easy to handle.
>
> > If I can assume that external outlines go in clockwise order, I
> >
https://codereview.appspot.com/561680043/diff/577820044/lily/include/transform.hh
File lily/include/transform.hh (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/561680043/diff/577820044/lily/include/transform.hh#newcode33
lily/include/transform.hh:33: int print_smob (SCM p, scm_print_state *)
const;
Thi
On 2020/04/25 17:07:17, hahnjo wrote:
> I strongly object to adding more random scripts to the source tree.
There are
> already far too many unmaintained in scripts/auxiliar/ with no
documentation at
> all.
How about approaching this in a different manner then? Adding
instructions to the CG about
> In https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/typography/opentype/spec/ttch01
> it is explained that outside curves go clockwise. Does that hold for
> other font types too? (PFA, OTF?)
PostScript flavoured glyphs like PFA or OTF[*] have the opposite
orientation. You can easily check whether the used Fr
El 24/4/20 a las 17:18, Jonas Hahnfeld escribió:
However I'm pretty sure that many translations in the latter are dead:
As far as I understand we don't translate the docs by putting the
strings in Documentation/po, but rather by copying the files and
translating them below Documentation/lang.
D
> is there a standard wrt to outline direction?
There are two: TrueType and PostScript, which are exactly the
opposite. However, all glyphs in a font have the same orientation, so
this should be easy to handle.
> If I can assume that external outlines go in clockwise order, I
> could skip left
LGTM
https://codereview.appspot.com/561680043/
Reviewers: hahnjo,
Message:
sure.
Description:
Add a script for running timing benchmarks
Please review this at https://codereview.appspot.com/545950043/
Affected files (+97, -0 lines):
A scripts/auxiliar/benchmark.py
Index: scripts/auxiliar/benchmark.py
diff --git a/scripts/auxiliar/benchm
I strongly object to adding more random scripts to the source tree.
There are already far too many unmaintained in scripts/auxiliar/ with no
documentation at all.
https://codereview.appspot.com/545950043/
On 2020/04/25 08:32:40, dak wrote:
> > I have plans to do this, but they require overhaul of calling
conventions in
> the
> > stencil -> {box,building} -> skyline pipeline.
this was actually much simpler than I thought. See
https://codereview.appspot.com/581960043/
https://codereview.appspot.c
Tested on GUILE v1 (ubuntu xenial docker), and GUILE 2 (fedora)
https://codereview.appspot.com/567500043/
Good point. I'll run it through my GUILE1 docker tests.
On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 11:41 AM David Kastrup wrote:
>
> Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
>
> > I just uploaded https://codereview.appspot.com/567500043
> >
> > this breaks the GUILE v2 reg tests, so I'd like to push this soon.
>
> If you checked
Reviewers: Valentin Villenave,
Message:
On 2020/04/25 09:01:49, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> Thanks, this should be pushed immediately I think.
>
> (Man, did this regtest give us a lot of headaches.)
>
>
https://codereview.appspot.com/567500043/diff/577810043/input/regression/font-name-add-files.
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
> I just uploaded https://codereview.appspot.com/567500043
>
> this breaks the GUILE v2 reg tests, so I'd like to push this soon.
If you checked that the change doesn't break the Guile v1 tests. I
mean, as far as one can check, given that those breakages also depend on
On 2020/04/25 08:36:02, hahnjo wrote:
> On 2020/04/24 20:14:36, hahnjo wrote:
> > On 2020/04/24 18:25:33, lemzwerg wrote:
> > > LGTM, thanks a lot!
> > >
> > >
https://codereview.appspot.com/551830043/diff/573740043/po/GNUmakefile
> > > File po/GNUmakefile (right):
> > >
> > >
> >
>
https://coder
Thanks, this should be pushed immediately I think.
(Man, did this regtest give us a lot of headaches.)
https://codereview.appspot.com/567500043/diff/577810043/input/regression/font-name-add-files.ly
File input/regression/font-name-add-files.ly (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/567500043/d
I just uploaded https://codereview.appspot.com/567500043
this breaks the GUILE v2 reg tests, so I'd like to push this soon.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - hanw...@gmail.com - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
On 2020/04/24 20:14:36, hahnjo wrote:
> On 2020/04/24 18:25:33, lemzwerg wrote:
> > LGTM, thanks a lot!
> >
> >
https://codereview.appspot.com/551830043/diff/573740043/po/GNUmakefile
> > File po/GNUmakefile (right):
> >
> >
>
https://codereview.appspot.com/551830043/diff/573740043/po/GNUmakefile#
On 2020/04/25 07:29:06, hanwenn wrote:
> On 2020/04/24 22:04:52, dak wrote:
> > On 2020/04/24 21:33:12, Carl wrote:
> > > On 2020/04/24 21:19:57, dak wrote:
> > > > On 2020/04/24 21:18:12, dak wrote:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
https://codereview.appspot.com/579630043/diff/555740043/lily/stencil-
Patch is attached to this mail as a file if that is more convenient.
Kevin
>From 1c5715ad52139aab936ee7dffb2cdef3d123b369 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kevin Barry
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 19:26:26 +0100
Subject: [PATCH v1] Issue 3778: Use bounding box as skylines for markup in svg
backend
As th
On 2020/04/24 22:04:52, dak wrote:
> On 2020/04/24 21:33:12, Carl wrote:
> > On 2020/04/24 21:19:57, dak wrote:
> > > On 2020/04/24 21:18:12, dak wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
https://codereview.appspot.com/579630043/diff/555740043/lily/stencil-integral.cc
> > > > File lily/stencil-integral.cc (right)
22 matches
Mail list logo