On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 4:00 PM Owen Lamb wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Apologies for the lateness of this update. Last week was mostly research
> into stylistic alternates and how to support OpenType features in a SMuFL
> font, so not much was done in the way of code changes aside from creating a
>
Hi all,
Apologies for the lateness of this update. Last week was mostly research
into stylistic alternates and how to support OpenType features in a SMuFL
font, so not much was done in the way of code changes aside from creating a
proof-of-concept stylistic alternate mapping.
It appears that the
Am Montag, den 15.06.2020, 07:50 -0400 schrieb Dan Eble:
> Han-Wen proposed building with -Werror in a merge request. What do you think?
>
> I like -Werror, but I've only ever used it where there were very few (or one)
> supported build environments, all of which were covered in CI. A
Dan Eble writes:
> Han-Wen proposed building with -Werror in a merge request. What do you think?
>
> I like -Werror, but I've only ever used it where there were very few
> (or one) supported build environments, all of which were covered in
> CI. A dimension of the CI coverage was optimization
Han-Wen proposed building with -Werror in a merge request. What do you think?
I like -Werror, but I've only ever used it where there were very few (or one)
supported build environments, all of which were covered in CI. A dimension of
the CI coverage was optimization level, which can change
