Re: Version 2.21.3

2020-07-17 Thread Neo Anderson via Discussions on LilyPond development
Thank you. It works for v. 2.21.3.Reagards,Neo On Friday, July 17, 2020, 12:44:43 PM GMT+2, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 8:38 AM Jonas Hahnfeld wrote: > > Test: \version "2.21.3" { c' } > > With this last version, the first compilation is OK, but the second is > >

Re: GUB failing

2020-07-17 Thread David Kastrup
"Phil Holmes" writes: > Not sure it's working. It ran happily for just over 15 minutes and > seems to have stalled for the last hour. It's not consuming CPU but > hasn't returned. The log has: > > unlocked-dist-check rule > make[3]: Entering directory `/home/gub/NewGub/gub' >

Re: GUB failing

2020-07-17 Thread Phil Holmes
Not sure it's working. It ran happily for just over 15 minutes and seems to have stalled for the last hour. It's not consuming CPU but hasn't returned. The log has: unlocked-dist-check rule make[3]: Entering directory `/home/gub/NewGub/gub'

Re: Today's problem with GUB build

2020-07-17 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 5:05 PM Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 4:47 PM Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > > Maybe something is off with the init after fork, but GUILE's random > > initialization also doesn't look very reliable: > > > >

Re: Today's problem with GUB build

2020-07-17 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 4:47 PM Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > Maybe something is off with the init after fork, but GUILE's random > initialization also doesn't look very reliable: > >

Re: Today's problem with GUB build

2020-07-17 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 10:58 AM David Kastrup wrote: > > Han-Wen Nienhuys writes: > > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 10:48 PM David Kastrup wrote: > > > >> Well ok. But only 100 random numbers are being used (there is > >> another call using 1000 instead, the choice appearing random). > >>

Re: Version 2.21.3

2020-07-17 Thread Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development
Am Freitag, den 17.07.2020, 12:44 +0200 schrieb Han-Wen Nienhuys: > On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 8:38 AM Jonas Hahnfeld wrote: > > > Test: \version "2.21.3" { c' } > > > With this last version, the first compilation is OK, but the second is > > > failing: > > > > > > Starting lilypond-windows.exe

Re: Version 2.21.3

2020-07-17 Thread Pierre Perol-Schneider
Thank you Han-Wen! Cheers, Pierre Le ven. 17 juil. 2020 à 12:44, Han-Wen Nienhuys a écrit : > On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 8:38 AM Jonas Hahnfeld wrote: > > > Test: \version "2.21.3" { c' } > > > With this last version, the first compilation is OK, but the second is > failing: > > > > > > Starting

Re: Version 2.21.3

2020-07-17 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 8:38 AM Jonas Hahnfeld wrote: > > Test: \version "2.21.3" { c' } > > With this last version, the first compilation is OK, but the second is > > failing: > > > > Starting lilypond-windows.exe 2.21.3 [Untitled]... > > Processing > >

Re: Version 2.21.3

2020-07-17 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
I'll try to have a look today. On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 8:38 AM Jonas Hahnfeld wrote: > > Hi, > > Am Donnerstag, den 16.07.2020, 19:01 +0200 schrieb Pierre Perol- > Schneider: > > Hi, > > Test: \version "2.21.3" { c' } > > With this last version, the first compilation is OK, but the second is >

Re: Version 2.21.3

2020-07-17 Thread Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development
Hi, Am Donnerstag, den 16.07.2020, 19:01 +0200 schrieb Pierre Perol- Schneider: > Hi, > Test: \version "2.21.3" { c' } > With this last version, the first compilation is OK, but the second is > failing: > > Starting lilypond-windows.exe 2.21.3 [Untitled]... > Processing >