Hi Owen,
it's always a pleasure seeing your project evolve and proceed. I'd like
to throw in a comment, although I'm rather sure it isn't actually
needed.
Am Freitag, den 07.08.2020, 21:49 -0700 schrieb Owen Lamb:
> Hi all!
>
> ...
>
> --turned out to be a major point of difference between
> Lil
Hi all!
I've been pretty active on the mailing list this week, so you can see what
I've been up to by checking out the archive.
Essentially, what first seemed to be a minor inconvenience--a grob
misplacement--turned out to be a major point of difference between
LilyPond's and SMuFL's treatment of
Hi,
I just did `make -j5 CPU_COUNT=5` with some experimental patch on top
of current master.
It failed with
lilypond-book.py: error: file not found:
single-staff-template-with-notes-and-lyrics.ly
This file _is_ present, I checked this!
Without changing anything I did `make -j5 CPU_COUNT=5` again.
> Could https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/issues/1006 be what
> you’re looking for?
It is, thanks!
Werner
Werner,
Could [1]https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/issues/1006 be what
you’re looking for?
Jean
References
1. https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/issues/1006
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 9:03 PM Carl Sorensen
wrote:
>
> I am a bit concerned that we are talking about eliminating some of what I
> think are superior design decisions of LilyPond in order to be SMuFL
> compliant. I prefer the convention of attaching the flag to the center of
> the stem as oppos
>> > the breathing sign is non-musical, and the accidental is musical,
>> > so this should be prevented by the skyline distancing. It would
>> > be interesting to see what lily thinks the skylines look like.
>>
>> Here it is.
>>
> these are the skylines for vertical spacing. You need the ones for
On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 5:38 PM Werner LEMBERG wrote
>
> I consider the output of the second case much better – I don't like
> the vertical offset of the accent if a natural is present.
>
> What edition was the model for the large horizontal size of the accent
> glyph?
>
Not sure; maybe one of my
On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 5:30 PM Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> >> Look at the following code.
> >>
> >> \relative c'' {
> >> f2 \breathe |
> >> g2 \breathe }
> >>
> >> As the attached images show, the breathing sign *sometimes*
> >> collides with accidentals. Looks like a bug. If you agre
Compare this:
{ f'!8[-> f'-> f'-> f'->] }
with this:
dashLarger = \tweak font-size #-1.2 \accent
{ f'!8[-> f'-> f'-> f'->] }
I consider the output of the second case much better – I don't like
the vertical offset of the accent if a natural is present.
What edition was the model for the
>> Attached I've added some more tests. LilyPond's behaviour
>> w.r.t. accidentals looks very erratical...
>
> Is this another manifestation of that age-old dotted rest problem
> that plagued the reg tests for years that was fixed end of last year
> (but I forget by who - Thomas?) where the dot w
>> Look at the following code.
>>
>> \relative c'' {
>> f2 \breathe |
>> g2 \breathe }
>>
>> As the attached images show, the breathing sign *sometimes*
>> collides with accidentals. Looks like a bug. If you agree I'll
>> add it to the tracker.
>
> the breathing sign is non-musical,
On Aug 7, 2020, at 01:59, Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond
development wrote:
>
> It's not that !84 came out of nothing. It would have helped if people
> actually tested before that landed, I was pretty much the only one…
>
> Jonas
I'm not sure who "people" are, but this is my take o
> On 7 Aug 2020, at 08:17, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> As the attached images show, the breathing sign *sometimes* collides
> with accidentals. Looks like a bug. If you agree I'll add it to the
> tracker.
>
> Any idea how to circumvent that?
In addition to that, I place the breath mark above
On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 8:17 AM Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> [lilypond e16a5ec 2020-Aug-06]
>
>
> Look at the following code.
>
> \relative c'' {
> f2 \breathe |
> g2 \breathe }
>
> As the attached images show, the breathing sign *sometimes* collides
> with accidentals. Looks like a bug.
On 07/08/2020 10:37, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
As the attached images show, the breathing sign *sometimes* collides
with accidentals. Looks like a bug.
Attached I've added some more tests. LilyPond's behaviour
w.r.t. accidentals looks very erratical...
Werner
Is this another manifestati
>> As the attached images show, the breathing sign *sometimes*
>> collides with accidentals. Looks like a bug. If you agree I'll
>> add it to the tracker.
>>
>> Any idea how to circumvent that?
>
> Adjusting the vertical bounds of the BreathingSign appears to help:
>
>
> \relative c'' {
>
> As the attached images show, the breathing sign *sometimes* collides
> with accidentals. Looks like a bug.
Attached I've added some more tests. LilyPond's behaviour
w.r.t. accidentals looks very erratical...
Werner
\paper {
indent = 0
ragged-right = ##t
}
\relative c'' {
\omit Sc
18 matches
Mail list logo
