Re: Stop issue verification?

On Nov 1, 2020, at 14:12, Jean Abou Samra wrote: > > Le 01/11/2020 à 19:11, Jonas Hahnfeld a écrit : > >> Am Sonntag, den 01.11.2020, 17:03 +0100 schrieb Jean Abou Samra: >>> In order to finish things properly, I would like to implement >>> the resolution here.Is this fine by everyone? Jonas?

Re: Stop issue verification?

Le 01/11/2020 à 19:11, Jonas Hahnfeld a écrit : Am Sonntag, den 01.11.2020, 17:03 +0100 schrieb Jean Abou Samra: In order to finish things properly, I would like to implement the resolution here.Is this fine by everyone? Jonas? To recap: - Update CG, - Delete the following under "Status":

Re: Stop issue verification?

Am Sonntag, den 01.11.2020, 17:03 +0100 schrieb Jean Abou Samra: > In order to finish things properly, I would like to implement > the resolution here.Is this fine by everyone? Jonas? > > To recap: > - Update CG, > - Delete the following under "Status": new, accepted, started, >    fixed,

Re: Stop issue verification?

In order to finish things properly, I would like to implement the resolution here.Is this fine by everyone? Jonas? To recap: - Update CG, - Delete the following under "Status": new, accepted, started,   fixed, verified. - Rename Status::invalid and Status::duplicate into Invalid   and Duplicate,

Lilypond stable release candidate now available

We are pleased to announce that Lilypond 2.21.80 has now been released and is available to download and install.  This is the first release candidate for the next stable version: 2.22.0, so we would be grateful if as many users as possible could install and test it. Thanks in advance. --

Re: ready for 2.21.80?

Am Sonntag, den 01.11.2020, 13:54 +0100 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld: > Am Sonntag, den 01.11.2020, 12:36 + schrieb Phil Holmes: > > On 01/11/2020 12:30, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote: > > > Am Sonntag, den 01.11.2020, 12:02 + schrieb Phil Holmes: > > > > Thanks.  Now uploaded. > > > Thanks to you for

Re: ready for 2.21.80?

Am Sonntag, den 01.11.2020, 12:36 + schrieb Phil Holmes: > On 01/11/2020 12:30, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote: > > Am Sonntag, den 01.11.2020, 12:02 + schrieb Phil Holmes: > > > Thanks.  Now uploaded. > > Thanks to you for staying with us while we resolve such things! > > > > > We do need to get

Re: ready for 2.21.80?

On 01/11/2020 12:30, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote: Am Sonntag, den 01.11.2020, 12:02 + schrieb Phil Holmes: Thanks.  Now uploaded. Thanks to you for staying with us while we resolve such things! We do need to get the latest/correct VERSION into master, as well as updating the news details. 

Re: ready for 2.21.80?

Am Sonntag, den 01.11.2020, 12:02 + schrieb Phil Holmes: > Thanks.  Now uploaded. Thanks to you for staying with us while we resolve such things! > We do need to get the latest/correct VERSION into master, as well as updating > the news details.  That should allow the website to be rebuilt. 

Re: ready for 2.21.80?

Thanks.  Now uploaded.  We do need to get the latest/correct VERSION into master, as well as updating the news details.  That should allow the website to be rebuilt.  I'm assuming that the best bet would be to cherry-pick the news updates from stable/2.22 into release/unstable, and edit and