>> Thanks. It's not clear to me what I should do now. Shall the
>> whole subsubsection simply be removed? Shall a warning be added
>> that this section is under construction?
>
> Let's leave it as-is for now as it reflects the current state, even
> though the example is moot. I'll revamp
> Am 08.10.2021 um 12:04 schrieb David Kastrup :
>
> Jan-Peter Voigt writes:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> probably what I am writing now is not new to most of you. About a year
>> ago there was a discussion regarding the license of Lilypond, triggered
>> by Urs' question about the future of OLL.
Hello,
Here is the current patch countdown list. The next countdown will be on
October 10th.
A list of all merge requests can be found here:
https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests?sort=label_priority
Push:
!948 Fix infinite loop with top-level \lyricsto - Dan Eble
Le 8 oct. 2021 à 11:45, Werner LEMBERG a écrit :
>>> I've found some minor documentation and formatting issues in NR
>>> section 5.5.6, "Unpure-pure containers", which I'm going to fix. In
>>> general, however, there is a serious problem with the example in this
>>> subsubsection, as documented
Jan-Peter Voigt writes:
> Hi all,
>
> probably what I am writing now is not new to most of you. About a year
> ago there was a discussion regarding the license of Lilypond, triggered
> by Urs' question about the future of OLL. Again and again the
> documentation was referred to, which says that
>> Looking at the current output of regtest `unpure-pure-container.ly`
>> I have the feeling that the description text doesn't fit the code
>> at all: It always talks about the second note of each group, while
>> the code modifies the first note.
>
> To answer the second part of your question:
>> I've found some minor documentation and formatting issues in NR
>> section 5.5.6, "Unpure-pure containers", which I'm going to fix. In
>> general, however, there is a serious problem with the example in this
>> subsubsection, as documented in issue #3512:
>>
>>
Hi all,
probably what I am writing now is not new to most of you. About a year
ago there was a discussion regarding the license of Lilypond, triggered
by Urs' question about the future of OLL. Again and again the
documentation was referred to, which says that Lilypond is a compiler
that
Le 08/10/2021 à 09:24, Werner LEMBERG a écrit :
Looking at the current output of regtest `unpure-pure-container.ly` I
have the feeling that the description text doesn't fit the code at
all: It always talks about the second note of each group, while the
code modifies the first note.
To answer
Le 08/10/2021 à 09:24, Werner LEMBERG a écrit :
I've found some minor documentation and formatting issues in NR
section 5.5.6, "Unpure-pure containers", which I'm going to fix. In
general, however, there is a serious problem with the example in this
subsubsection, as documented in issue #3512:
I've found some minor documentation and formatting issues in NR
section 5.5.6, "Unpure-pure containers", which I'm going to fix. In
general, however, there is a serious problem with the example in this
subsubsection, as documented in issue #3512:
11 matches
Mail list logo
