Re: \fine, pre-process-in-final-translation-timestep & co.

2022-07-18 Thread Dan Eble
On Jul 10, 2022, at 12:04, Jean Abou Samra wrote: > > The currently recommended syntax for DS al fine > repeats is > > \repeat segno 2 { > c'1 1 1 1 > \volta 2 \fine > c'1 1 1 1 > } > > This seems to work just as well, though: > > \repeat segno 2 { > c'1 1 1 1 > \volta 2 \fine > \v

Re: Easy to tackle bug/feature

2022-07-18 Thread Dan Eble
On Jul 18, 2022, at 09:49, Paulo Matos wrote: > > Anyway, let me take a look and see if I can make sense of it. Dan, are > you the right person to bother if I have any further questions? It is best to post questions to lilypond-devel so that everyone can participate in answering and learning. —

Re: Easy to tackle bug/feature

2022-07-18 Thread Jean Abou Samra
Le 18/07/2022 à 13:56, Dan Eble a écrit : On Jul 18, 2022, at 01:46, Paulo Matos wrote: I feel therefore compelled to ask if there's any other suggestion about what I could look at. I am familiar with C++/Scheme code (although most of my Scheme is done in Racket, not Guile but that shouldn't

Re: Easy to tackle bug/feature

2022-07-18 Thread Paulo Matos
Dan Eble writes: > On Jul 18, 2022, at 01:46, Paulo Matos wrote: >> >> I feel therefore compelled to ask if there's any other suggestion about >> what I could look at. I am familiar with C++/Scheme code (although most >> of my Scheme is done in Racket, not Guile but that shouldn't be a >> blo

Re: Easy to tackle bug/feature

2022-07-18 Thread Dan Eble
On Jul 18, 2022, at 01:46, Paulo Matos wrote: > > I feel therefore compelled to ask if there's any other suggestion about > what I could look at. I am familiar with C++/Scheme code (although most > of my Scheme is done in Racket, not Guile but that shouldn't be a > blocker). https://gitlab.com/l