Re: Guile 1.8 in Ubuntu 17.04

2017-03-10 Thread Antonio Ospite
Not sure why the package from Debian unstable didn't make it into testing tho, maybe the problem was sorted out too late to have the package in the next debian stable release. It'll probably be in stretch-backports at some point. Ciao, Antonio -- Antonio Ospite https://ao2.it https://tw

Re: guile-2.0 and debian

2016-12-07 Thread Antonio Ospite
from here: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/collab-maint/lilypond.git/tree/debian/control?h=debian And pass the list to apt-get. Ciao, Antonio -- Antonio Ospite https://ao2.it https://twitter.com/ao2it A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.

Re: guile-2.0 and debian

2016-12-06 Thread Antonio Ospite
On Tue, 6 Dec 2016 00:24:26 +0100 Thomas Morley wrote: > 2016-11-29 19:34 GMT+01:00 Antonio Ospite : > > On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 10:11:35 +0100 > > Thomas Morley wrote: > > > >> 2016-11-25 23:19 GMT+01:00 Antonio Ospite : > >> > >> > In the mean

Re: guile2: string-delete and string-filter

2016-11-29 Thread Antonio Ospite
entation to see if it follows the current style (3 spaces?). However AFAICS this patch only fixes warnings, not actual bugs, so this is not urgent. Have you decided how to handle the updates to the dev/guile-2-work branch? Ciao, Antonio -- Antonio Ospite https://ao2.it https://twitter.com/ao

Re: guile-2.0 and debian

2016-11-29 Thread Antonio Ospite
On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 10:11:35 +0100 Thomas Morley wrote: > 2016-11-25 23:19 GMT+01:00 Antonio Ospite : > > > In the mean time I started to write a TODO list of the missing pieces: [...] > Another one for the TODO-list > lilypond is not able to find files with utf8-char

Re: lilypond, guile 2 and OpenSuSE

2016-11-25 Thread Antonio Ospite
> that the guile-2-version is much slower (real exec times): > > guile-2-version: 0m20,032s 0m19,186 0m19,124s > guile-1-version: 0m8,814s 0m9,023s 0m8,971s > I started to keep a TODO of what is left to make lilypond with guile-2 comparable with lilypond with guile-1.8, inves

Re: guile-2.0 and debian

2016-11-25 Thread Antonio Ospite
numbers are different in some decimal digits (Reported by Knut Petersen) - Investigate why lilypond is a lot slower when using guile-2.0 Thanks, Antonio -- Antonio Ospite https://ao2.it https://twitter.com/ao2it A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. See h

Re: guile-2.0 and debian

2016-11-24 Thread Antonio Ospite
e that for Linux users containers are the best approach. > And about the choice between guile 1.8 or 2.0.12/13, it should be possible to have both guile-1.8 and guile-2.0 packages installed in the same image and then let lilypond choose which one to pick up at configure-time, shoudln't it? De

Re: guile-2.0 and debian

2016-11-23 Thread Antonio Ospite
On Wed, 23 Nov 2016 09:34:05 +0100 David Kastrup wrote: > Antonio Ospite writes: > > > On Wed, 23 Nov 2016 00:25:03 +0100 > > Thomas Morley wrote: > > > > [...] > >> Hi Antonio, > >> > >> I figured to do a regtest-compari

Re: guile-2.0 and debian

2016-11-23 Thread Antonio Ospite
d images in a directory, at least firefox does. BTW the results are promising, with my latest patchset the UTF-8 characters should be rendered fine. The images are not pixel perfect because when using guile-2.0 the floating point numbers in the postscript output are formatted slightly differently and th

Re: guile-2.0 and debian

2016-11-22 Thread Antonio Ospite
On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 10:49:07 +0100 David Kastrup wrote: > Thomas Morley writes: > > > 2016-11-20 23:23 GMT+01:00 Antonio Ospite : > >> On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 22:07:39 +0100 > >> Antonio Ospite wrote: > >> > >>> On Sun, 20

Re: guile-2.0 and debian

2016-11-22 Thread Antonio Ospite
ptable too: I can see unicode characters in the html output (out-www/offline-root/index.html). I'll take a look at "make test" soon. Ciao, Antonio -- Antonio Ospite https://ao2.it https://twitter.com/ao2it A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.

Re: guile-2.0 and debian

2016-11-22 Thread Antonio Ospite
locally and also cleaned up the old patches, I am waiting for a build round to complete and then I'll post an update. BTW, please make sure you start from a clean working dir ("make distclean", or at least "make doc-clean") on your next test. Ciao ciao, Antonio -- An

Re: guile-2.0 and debian

2016-11-21 Thread Antonio Ospite
On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 10:59:17 +0100 Thomas Morley wrote: > 2016-11-21 10:49 GMT+01:00 Antonio Ospite : > > > Can I look at your ./56/lily-44b4b5eb.eps file? > > Here you are. > The problem is that there are still some numbers formatted with commas as decimal points w

Re: guile-2.0 and debian

2016-11-21 Thread Antonio Ospite
On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 10:37:31 +0100 Thomas Morley wrote: > 2016-11-19 16:05 GMT+01:00 Antonio Ospite : > [...] > > With this setup your test file should work. > > > The test-file indeed works, but not "make LANGS='' doc" > > Earlier every file

Re: guile-2.0 and debian

2016-11-20 Thread Antonio Ospite
On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 22:07:39 +0100 Antonio Ospite wrote: > On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 01:12:59 +0100 > Thomas Morley wrote: > [...] > > Well, this example gives a gs-error again: > > > > \header { title = "ちりぬるを)" } \markup \null > > > > The problem

Re: guile-2.0 and debian

2016-11-20 Thread Antonio Ospite
On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 01:12:59 +0100 Thomas Morley wrote: > Hi, > > for now I looked only at a single problem, the meta-data. (Giving me a > royal headache) > > 2016-11-19 16:05 GMT+01:00 Antonio Ospite : > > > The following cha

Re: guile-2.0 and debian

2016-11-19 Thread Antonio Ospite
Hi, just to confirm my understanding about some previous items. On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 13:05:47 +0100 Antonio Ospite wrote: [...] > I compared the postscript output of the same lilypond git revision built > with both guile-1.8 (in a debian stable container) and guile-2.0, and by > lookin

Re: guile-2.0 and debian

2016-11-19 Thread Antonio Ospite
On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 22:24:27 +0100 David Kastrup wrote: > Antonio Ospite writes: > > > - > > (process:18706): Pango-WARNING **: Invalid UTF-8 string passed to > &g

Re: guile-2.0 and debian

2016-11-19 Thread Antonio Ospite
On Sat, 19 Nov 2016 16:05:22 +0100 Antonio Ospite wrote: [...] > - and than when scm_read() (lily/parse-scm.cc in ^ This is a "then". > internal_ly_parse_scm()) is called to parse the embedded scm, and > the latter is interpreted as Latin1 too

Re: guile-2.0 and debian

2016-11-19 Thread Antonio Ospite
st rerunning the make command worked. This is with the patches at: https://ao2.it/tmp/lilypond-guile2/patches_2016-11-19/ on top of the git tag "release/2.19.50-1". With this setup your test file should work. I still need to clean things up, and ask for advice for better fixes, but I wan

Re: meta-data with guile2

2016-11-19 Thread Antonio Ospite
our test file work, I am preparing a reply to your previous message, just waiting for "make LANGS='' doc" to complete... which takes a while here. Thanks, Antonio -- Antonio Ospite https://ao2.it https://twitter.com/ao2it A: Because it messes up the order in which peop

Re: guile-2.0 and debian

2016-11-17 Thread Antonio Ospite
ays, so... read below. > That said: > > 2016-11-14 13:13 GMT+01:00 Antonio Ospite : > > Hi everyone, > > > > On Mon, 14 Nov 2016 01:15:52 +0100 > > David Kastrup wrote: > > > >> Thomas Morley writes: > >> > >> > Short update

Re: guile-2.0 and debian

2016-11-14 Thread Antonio Ospite
On Mon, 14 Nov 2016 14:07:08 +0100 David Kastrup wrote: > Antonio Ospite writes: > > > For instance if David, or someone else, could confirm that patch 0005 > > [1] actually makes sense I would propose it for inclusion in lilypond. > > > > Thanks, > >An

Re: guile-2.0 and debian

2016-11-14 Thread Antonio Ospite
ble to figure out what the correct fix is. For instance if David, or someone else, could confirm that patch 0005 [1] actually makes sense I would propose it for inclusion in lilypond. Thanks, Antonio [1] https://ao2.it/tmp/lilypond-guile2/0005-Fix-ending-the-dynamic-extent-in-Text_inte