Putting these into the path would also not help.
- you can not run convert-ly.py
- you must use python convert-ly.py - But if you do, you must say:
python "c:\program files\lilypond\usr\bin\convert-ly.py" So you didn't
gain much.
Still I don't see it is useful.
Perhaps we should look at the p
Of course it should, but probably not the current \bin\ folder
Why? On Windows platforms people rarely use the PATH to run programs.
Bert
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-deve
I don't think that lilypond path should be in the PATH.
Bert
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
LilyPond's bundled python is useless (unless something has changed in
the past 6 months), so I don't see why it is still bundled.
It is needed an perfectly good to run convert-ly.
Bert
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http:/
To understand what is going on I would like to start with the
following task I
have seen at the web site:
* * *
In addition, we are still looking for help with the following website
tasks,
* An overview of all editing environments available
* * *
Bertalan Fodor has offered to do this
I think that's a bug in the validator :-)
Bert
Korneel írta:
This little note, only to say that your current homepage does NOT validate
through this URL: http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=referer
Best wishes and please continue developping this wonderful software!
Korneel
__
Ok, I'm happy to do this. But what should I write about emacs, vim etc?
Should I write about configuration, or link to the manual?
Bert
So spend 30 minutes and create a general editor webpage for lilypond.
If you omit emacs or vim you'll probably have a riot, but you only
need one paragraph ab
Well, we have a webpage about at least one quite good editor:
http://lilypondtool.organum.hu ;-)
Graham Percival írta:
Bertalan Fodor wrote:
I don't think it should be in the manual at all; I'd prefer this
info to be on the webpages.
Ok, but the link to the webpage about editors
I don't think it should be in the manual at all; I'd prefer this info
to be on the webpages.
Ok, but the link to the webpage about editors should be at an emphasized
place in the doc.
Bert
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
htt
Finally, it's probably a good idea to add a footnote with a link to
some overview
of different text editors, since the one supplied with LilyPond on
Windows and
probably also on Mac is fairly rudimentary. This should replace the
current
footnote 1.
I don't think it should be a footnote. Using
I feel that these categories are not leading the mind. Users usually
wants to make a graphical representation of some music, and not doing
scheme, or trick, or whatever.
For example, many tweaks are ''simple'' ''scheme-trick''s, that
(naturally) involves some ''scheme-programming''... I'd better
Categories or keywords? Will it be possible to use it offline? E.g. in
LilyPondTool there is a full-text search, with weighted results. I
imagine writing "fermata last bar" and getting a snippet page (or more).
Bert
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
l
IMHO a Sibelius rendering would also be important, because as I know it
more closely follows European engraving traditions, and it has already
become another standard notation software.
Bert
Han-Wen Nienhuys írta:
Tõnis Kaumann escreveu:
A few remarks:
1) LilyPond site still refers to Fi
Take a look at LaTeX. Using the current versions, we can easily build a 20-years
old file. With lilypond, we need to rewrite it in order to compile a 6-year old
file.
LaTex is a very bad example IMHO. Because it has essentially not
developed in the last 5-10 years.
___
Ok :-)
Let's make 2nd try:
Created as a plugin for the jEdit (http://www.jedit.org) text editor
LilyPondTool is the most feature-rich text-based tool for editing
LilyPond scores. Its features include a Document Wizard with lyrics
support to set up documents easier, and embedded PDF viewer with a
In that case, I recommend to use GrandStaff instead. The only reason
to use PianoStaff
is to get the fixed spacing to be able to handle cross-staff beams.
This fixed spacing is a very strict limitation, which makes it
impossible to make beautiful piano scores. Why does this limitation
still
In section 13.6 Editor support I propose the following modifications.
--
- Because LilyPondTool has the most most features and generally (at
least on Windows platforms) it requires almost no configuration, I would
list it as the first.
- Remove the jEdit part and write the followi
Hi,
I have this working:
\once \override Voice.TextScript #'self-alignment-X = #1
But in recent versions I found in define-grobsscm:
;; todo: add X self alignment?
So is this interface not supported any more? Or is it a question of
supporting it? Or what?
Bert
___
Hello,
I'm wondering if it is intentional that lilypond-book.py became
lilypond-book and convert-ly.py became convert-ly in the Windows version
of 10.0-2. This is important for me, because for running these commands
from LilyPondTool I should know this information. Because if I change
the cod
I have created a patch now. Attached.
Thanks,
Bert
Han-Wen Nienhuys írta:
Bertalan Fodor schreef:
Anyone interested?
Should I create a patch? Against which version? Any suggestions?
Can you also add a relevant section to the manual? Thanks!
--- lilypond-book.itely 2006-10-24 09:52
Attached.
Bert
Han-Wen Nienhuys írta:
Bertalan Fodor schreef:
Hello,
I've created an enhancement for lilypond-book allowing us to use it
with DocBook documents.
Specification and examples can be read at
http://www.organum.hu/fileadmin/lilypondtool/lily-docbook.pdf
The enhanced scri
Hello,
I've created an enhancement for lilypond-book allowing us to use it with
DocBook documents.
Specification and examples can be read at
http://www.organum.hu/fileadmin/lilypondtool/lily-docbook.pdf
The enhanced script is at
http://www.organum.hu/fileadmin/lilypondtool/lilypond-book.py
I've got to know:
"Its a bug in the font renderer in JPedal not handling subroutines
generated by Ghostscript correctly. We have only seen it in Ghostscript
files so the work aroud would be to use another PDF tool. "
:-( Well, I've found that the Type1 subroutines are actually not found
by J
: /Unicode /Decoding
resource is not accessible but it is useful for generating ToUnicode CMap.
Han-Wen Nienhuys írta:
Bertalan Fodor wrote:
Hello,
I'm close to integrate JPedal PDF viewer into LilyPondTool for jEdit
(transparent point-and-click...) I'm curious if some of you have
Hello,
I'm close to integrate JPedal PDF viewer into LilyPondTool for jEdit
(transparent point-and-click...) I'm curious if some of you have ever
tried opening LilyPond generated PDF files with JPedal. Because if you
do some glyphs are missing. It is interesting, that they are not missing
if
Thanks, it's been got parsed now.
Bert
I think that I should fix it :-)
You're right, I've been lazy, and scheme gets on my nerves sometimes.
It should be (lambda* (#:rest seqs) ...), having
(use-modules (ice-9 optargs)) before.
nicolas
___
lilypon
Hello,
I've found this in the definition of parallelmusic:
;; check sequence length
(apply for-each (lambda (. seqs)
(let ((moment-reference (ly:music-length (car seqs
(for-each (lambda (seq moment)
(if (not (e
Well, I'm a bit scared.
It would be very valuable, if not only lilypond would be the only parser
on the world which can parse a ly file.
For example I had a very hard time to create my preliminary java parser,
because lilypond's syntax is so free and so dynamic (the language itself
can be redef
I don't use deadkeys. I have a keyboard with national characters, and I
use "right ALT", titled "Alt Gr", to type the replaced ones.
However, for programming I usually switch to English layout and avoid
accented chars.
Bert
Pénzü
Wow. Do you also parse Scheme?
Yes, but currently using brute-force (based on the EBNF, using many
infinite look-aheads).
Actually, I'm using antlr, which is a predictive LL(k) parser, so I need
to convert from LR to LL. However, my specification is to "accept all
valid input and disallow
Hello,
I'm very close to finish a Java-based parser for lilypond. I will use
this in jEdit-LilyPondTool for instant error checking and advanced code
completion and refactoring.
However, I found that it not trivial to identify certain token types. So
I'd like to ask here to show me examples or
Hello, I would be interested in some features to sponsor, so I'm curious
about the cost :-)
1. An XML file generated from the sources that has the same content as
the Programming Reference. This could be used in LilyPondTool, and
provide a possibility to get automatic completion from the current
Hello,
I found it to be so fun, that I created something I've been wanting for
some time now: a beginner's tutorial for LilyPond, using jEdit.
I'd appreciate if you looked at it and told me your opinion:
http://web.interware.hu/fodber/lilytut
Thanks,
Bert
__
Hello,
I'm looking at Ted Ross' book. It tells that: "some of the miscellaneous
uses of the normal size dot is [...] ties, slurs"
To render something similar that is in the book, I need the attached
fragment. Shouldn't it be the default for \slurDotted?
Ted Ross also uses these dots for Ottava
It may be the new point-and-click system. Or some font subsetting problem.
Bert
Johannes Schindelin írta:
Hi,
when I ran lily 2.5.?, it produced a PDF of 50 kB. Now, I upgraded (which
forced me to update almost every package on my system), and it produces a
PDF of 510 kB. Granted, it looks
Yes, you're right, but Scheme syntax is too hard for me. However, I hope
someone will use the idea to properly construct the feature. :-)
Bert
The idea is good, but this copy and paste job will not do
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-d
I've made a patch that enables me to define arbitrary paper sizes. The
implementation could be more general, but that way it would have taken
very much time for me, and I'm in a hurry :-) It works with PDF and PNG
backends.
The patch also contains some definitions for some more ISO paper sizes
/\override LyricText #'font-name = #"Gentium"/
With 2.6.0 and 2.6.3 it works like expected, so I can't reproduce the
problem. (Maybe the Gentium font has only been copied into
c:\Windows\Fonts and not installed?)
Bert
'COUR' because the file is 'COUR.TTF' (I'm not sure if the names are
c
I'll be happy to do final tests of the release on WinXP
Bert
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Bertalan: I'd apreciate if you could give me a few pointers of how you
have done things, just to easy things for me.
- I used mknetrel. My last cygwin/mknetrel is attached. (No patch yet,
sorry.)
- I also attach a shell script that describes quite well what is missing
from mknetrel, and wha
Yes, I did, but it only works in my build environment, and not in other
cygwin installation. I just couldn't find out what's missing.
The problem is still what has written in:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2005-07/msg00181.html
Bert
Didn't you have it built already, Bert?
Dear developers & users of Lilypond,
as you can see, it takes more and more time for me to release a
packaging of lilypond for cygwin. It has several causes:
- I'm getting less and less spare time, because of changes in my job and
my family
- I'm not a Unix guru
- I can't really follow the changes
I'm quite devoted to jEdit. It has a LilyPond plugin with some nice
features.
See instructions at http://lily4jedit.sourceforge.net/ch02.html
You can get assistance for the plugin at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think you should have sent your message to lilypond-user@gnu.org,
because that is the li
I couldn't build the documentation until I applied the attached patch.
However, I'm not sure if this is right, because I don't see exactly your
intention.
Bert
--- Documentation/pictures/GNUmakefile 2005-06-30 22:17:34.56250 +0200
+++ Documentation/pictures/GNUmakefile.new 2005-06-30
Hello, I had to apply the attached patch to build. It changes spaces to
tabs, because make said to do so.
Bert
--- cygwin/GNUmakefile 2005-06-30 17:24:06.18750 +0200
+++ cygwin/GNUmakefile.new 2005-06-30 17:16:30.62500 +0200
@@ -22,8 +22,8 @@
OUT_POSTREMOVES=$(POSTREMOVES:%=$(outd
Is the 'reg' command standard for Windowses? In WinXP you can use it to
set access the registry.
Anyway, using the command:
start "something.ly"
will run the associated application. It is a good question to decide,
whether the default assocation should be processing or editing.
Bert
___
Using environment variables in Windows is generally unsupported I think.
So I'd also prefer using the registry and the user's file associations
instead, setting a default one if there is nothing set.
Bert
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-dev
I ask here, because I couldn't figure it out. I get a message:
make[2]: *** No rule to make target
`/netrel/build/lilypond-2.5.31/cygwin/out/postinstall-lilypond.sh',
needed by `default'. Stop.
I can't see any problems in the cygwin makefile, so I don't know why
this happens.
Bert
_
>
> I am not sure how we can diagnose further. The next LilyPond version
> will have better diagnostic, so maybe we'll know.
I hope so.
>
> What version of windows do you run?
Windows XP SP2
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
ht
>
> can you double check that the lilypond process has permissions to read
> that file?
>
I can't check right now, but 5 minutes before, lilypond-2.5.27 could use
it. However, I don't even know, how to set permissions to not allow reading.
Bert
___
li
I tried with fonts.conf edited, to use Arial, and it gives the 'same'
message:
Layout output to `myFile.ps'...[C:/WINDOWS/fonts/arial.ttfBad TTF file
Bert
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l
Still tries to load Vera.ttf, and the causes "Bad TTF file". The PS file
is only:
%!PS-Adobe-3.0
%%Creator: LilyPond
%%Pages: 3
%%PageOrder: Ascend
%%Orientation: Portrait
%%DocumentPaperSizes: a4
%%DocumentSuppliedResources: font BitstreamVeraSans-Roman
%%DocumentSuppliedResources: font Century
If I use A5 papers #(set-default-paper-size "a5") it seems that psnup
can not correctly handle 2.5.26 ps files:
psnup -2 -pa4 -Pa5 b.ps
will create pages that are not centered.
In the 2.4.x series it worked well.
I've attached a file.
Use
gs -sPAPERSIZE=a5 -f "nup.ps"
to see the original, and
In font.scm there is:
(add-pango-fonts n 'roman "Century Schoolbook L" factor)
(add-pango-fonts n 'sans "Luxi Sans" factor)
But on Windows these fonts are not present. So Pango goes back to some
default: Bitstream Vera Sans for both. That's not optimal.
If I change font.scm to:
(add-pang
With lilypond.bat: why does it make sense, to put the result onto the
Desktop?
I asked because I run lilypond from jEdit, and I want the result to be
in the same directory as the source.
Bert
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu
I copy this to lilypond-devel as well, because I'm interested in the
developers' opinion, especially about the third step.
To use point-and-click with jEdit and Adobe Reader in the native build
of lilypond:
1. create a jump.bsh file somewhere, possibly in c:\prog\jEdit\macros\Misc\:
// COPY
A question:
with which file should I run lilypond? lilypond.bat or lilypond.exe?
With lilypond.bat: why does it make sense, to put the result onto the
Desktop?
Bert
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/
WOW!
It is working from the first moment! I could not try it thoroughly, but
I could run it from jEdit, and it produced well my test file. (However,
I could not view the pdf with Multivalent, may be some font problem.
I'll investigate it further.)
In the next days I will check this release s
After that and after a clean, the links are set correctly.
Bert
Hm. With pkg-config --libs pango I get:
-Wl,--export-dynamic -lpango-1.0 -lm -lgobject-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0
-lglib-2.0 -lintl -liconv
While there is
checking PANGO_FT2_LIBS... -Wl,--export-dynamic -lpangoft2-1.0
-lfontconfig -lfreetype
Hm. With pkg-config --libs pango I get:
-Wl,--export-dynamic -lpango-1.0 -lm -lgobject-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0
-lglib-2.0 -lintl -liconv
While there is
checking PANGO_FT2_LIBS... -Wl,--export-dynamic -lpangoft2-1.0
-lfontconfig -lfreetype -lz -lpango-1.0 -lm -lgobject-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0
-lglib-2.0 -li
There are no enc files so the ln fails.
cd /netrel/build/lilypond-2.5.24/share/lilypond/2.5.24/fonts/enc && \
ln -s ../../../../../mf/out/*.enc .
ln: creating symbolic link `./*.enc' to `../../../../../mf/out/*.enc':
No such file or directory
make[1]: ***
[/netrel/build/lilypond-2.5.24/share/l
Yeah! It builds and runs.
Bert
Jan Nieuwenhuizen írta:
Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
There was a problem with cygkpathsea-4.dll. Can you try the
unreleased tetex-3.0.0-3 from lilypond.org/cygwin? That should work
now.
Jan.
___
lilypond-devel mailing lis
I'd be happy to donate for this as well. And not to forget multiple
ossias in the same line.
Bert
Hans Forbrich írta:
I second that, together with an offer for a modest amount of funding.
Note that the ossia samples to which I have access include the following
features:
1) above the 'master'
Something's still not good. When starting lilypond.exe I get a Windows
error 0xc005.
With gdb:
(gdb) run
Starting program: /netrel/build/lilypond-2.4.5/lily/out/lilypond.exe
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
Error: dll starting at 0x11e1000 not found.
Program received signa
Still the same error.
So somehow this symbol is not found:
`kpathsea__libs_libkpathsea_dll_a_iname' when linking.
And only with lilypond.
The same happens with: gcc 3.3.1, 3.3.3, 3.4.1
When building your kpathsea.c, when I don't write -lkpathsea, I get:
kpathsea.o(.text+0x3b):kpathsea.cc: und
There seems to be a packaging error, /usr/lib/libkpathsea.la is
packaged in tetex-bin. Does that file look ok?
Yes it does.
Your minimal example builds with gcc. But shouldn't it build with g++?
Bert
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu
I can't link lilypond to kpathsea-4. I don't know where the problem lies.
g++ -o /netrel/build/lilypond-2.4.5//lily/out/lilypond ...
/netrel/build/lilypond-2.4.5//lily/out/../../flower/out/library.a
-lkpathsea -lintl /usr/bin/libpython2.4.dll -lguile -lguile-ltdl
-lcrypt -lm
fu98.o(.id
. Overprint boxes. The idea is that in case some text is colliding
with another grob (like a bar line), we add a possibility to `erase'
a rectangle slightly larger than the text before the text is
printed.
In some hand-engraved scores it is not a box, and not only for texts.
For example, y
2. I find that fonts are not embedded in PDF output, but everything is
drawn as lineart. Is this OK?
I'm not sure what you mean.
I mean that there are no embedded fonts in the PDF, letters and symbols
are drawn as curves. Is it intentional, or a ghostscript limitation or a
bug?
Yes, t
OK, I tried latest CVS.
It seem to work, but there are issues to solve:
1. In build log:
checking for shared libkpathsea... wc: conftest: No such file or directory
no
Where should conftest be? Any other thing to do to make this shared
library usage work?
2. I find that fonts are not embedded in P
When building 2.5.15 it can't find emmentaler-20.otf, however it is in
the search path (mf/out).
What am I missing?
Thanks,
Bert
GNU LilyPond 2.5.15
Processing `/netrel/src/lilypond-2.5.15/input/typography-demo.ly'
Parsing...
Interpreting music... error: cannot find `emmentaler-20.otf'
Music font
root? If there's really a need, then lilypond might have to be jailed and
put in a straight-jacket (meaning the shell and safe mode ;p)
~~~
ROOT? Never! Are there any good reason to run it as root?
Security has already been discussed on this list. IIRC there is a
lilypond safe mode to be used
The main problem is security: you can make lilypond run scheme code that
purges your (the server's) hardrive.
Is running lilypond in colinux faster than with cygwin?
Berti
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailm
When compiling the snippet as instructed, I got an
exception.
Yes, this is a preview, so there is no good error reporting.
Btw, does jEdit have emacs keybindings?
Shortcuts are configurable, so you can create something like that. But
there is no way to just turn it on.
Bert
___
When building the ec-fonts-mftraced package with the latest mftrace, the
(E)PS files contains the fonts embedded like this:
(For example)
%%Title: lily-102927469.dvi
%%DocumentFonts: GNU-LilyPond-feta-20 ecbx12
...
%%BeginFont: ecbx12
%!PS-AdobeFont-1.0: EuropeanComputerModern-BoldExtended12pt 00
Some proof of concept is ready.
I think there could be also a configuration wizard (to set PDF viewer
and bash's path), if something is not found in the path.
Attached a Tutorial.ly
Current implementation details:
- To turn on 'tutorial mode' the "LilyPond Tutorial" character sequence
must be prese
I checked the emacs tutorial. I don't think we should have a very
special mode in lily4jedit. If we use the lilypond mode, our plugin gets
active. So we can check for a special comment that turns the tutorial
mode on, that - for example - draws some background color for the
indented blocks. The
can you prepare a patch and send it to
tetex@dbs.uni-hannover.de
Ok, I'll try.
When do you want to upload your texex-3-safe lilypond?
I'm working on it... however there are ec-fonts issues there (I guess I
have to rebuild them with the latest CVS of mftrace).
Bert
_
2. fontconfig segfaults with /usr/share/ghostscript/fonts/hr* I had to
remove them
This should be fixed by the fontconfig maintainer to. Are the hr*
fonts standard? Does fontconfig work at all? Have you sent a bug
report?
Actually this may be a known bug with the fonts. Fontconfig its
I was able to build 2.5.13 on cygwin.
Issues:
1. cygwin/mknetrel see attached patch
2. fontconfig segfaults with /usr/share/ghostscript/fonts/hr* I had to
remove them
3. fontconfig's /etc/fonts/local.conf had to be updated manually to set
/usr/share/ghostscript/fonts. If not set, lilypond hangs (
That doesn't solve it. libio.h is needed by memory-stream.cc needed by pfb.cc
did you do make clean after removing the
#include
line?
Sure, but the memory stream functions are cookie_io_functions_t and
that's declared in libio.h. Do you think I could implement the missing
parts for cy
Does it make lilypond impossible to build for Cygwin?
oops. Just remove the include.
That doesn't solve it. libio.h is needed by memory-stream.cc needed by
pfb.cc
You'll have to find out for what functions it is included, and what
the alternatives on Cygwin are.
That's quite unfortunate. :-(
Be
Hello, I found that memory-stream.cc includes "libio.h", which is not
available in Cygwin.
According to Cygwin Project Co-Leader
Libio.h doesn't define anything which is available in Cygwin.
Does it make lilypond impossible to build for Cygwin?
Thanks,
Bert
__
írta:
Bertalan Fodor writes:
They could have exactly the same
contents, the point is just to be able to invoke the installation
script of ec-fonts after the installation of tetex-3.
I'm not sure if it is possible.
Why not, just increase the -build version
In fact, I would propose a dependency such that ec-fonts is always
installed after tetex-*, also since the font itself doesn't make sense
without tetex.
Some core maintainer of cygwin pointed us to not make font packages
dependent of tetex. However, we can put this dependency back, because we
ha
Yes. I've added removal of /var/lib/texmf to the post-texmf.sh
script, so I can send an update notice right after you lilypond with
tetex-3.0 fixes is installed in Cywgin.
You must also remove the tetex-2.0 generated files from /usr/share/web2c
mf.base, *.fmt, *.emft
Bert
_
So, the new lilypond must contain the updmap also for ec-fonts-mftraced.
This is a must, since ec-fonts doesn't rely on tetex, so tetex-3 may be
installed before ec-fonts.
Because tetex-3.0 will break existing lilypond, we must release
tetex-3.0 for cygwin at the same time with lilypond-2.4.3 a
FAIL2
ec-fonts are not found
Solution:
updmap --enable
Map=/usr/share/texmf/dvips/ec-fonts-mftraced/ec-mftrace.map
I'm not sure how to overcome this in the packages
How about adding this to lilypond?
Ok. I looked at /sauter-fonts-mftraced/GNUmakefile
I see:
# FIXME
I made the tests:
1. purge c:\cygwin
2. install old lilypond-2.4.2-1 with default settings - OK (this is the
test that that makes many user problem inexplicable)
3. install lilypond-2.4.3-1 (built against tetex-2.0) - OK
4. install tetex-3.0.0-1
FAIL1
Invoking `latex \\nonstopmode \\input 1.te
Ok. Fine. Tetex install-uninstall is somewhat problematic, I had to
purge the texmf tree again. And reinstall tex twice :-)
Lilypond's been built with all tetex-3.0 fixes against tetex-2.0
Now, what's next? According to your plan:
1. upload lilypond with all tetex-3.0 fixes, built against tetex-
Trying to build 2.4CVS with tetex-2.0
Almost everything works, but feta outline fonts are not found:
Invoking `dvips -Ppdf -u+ec-mftrace.map -u+lilypond.map -E -o
lily-1009715145.ep
s lily-1009715145'This is dvips(k) 5.92b Copyright 2002 Radical Eye
Software (ww
w.radicaleye.com)
' TeX output 200
I needed the following files at least to generate ecrm1000:
ecrm.mf
exaccess.mf
exbase.mf
expseudo.mf
exroman.mf
However, it still put up some error, looking for ecruwest.mf
To eliminate errors I also had to install all fonts inputted in exroman.mf:
exaccent.mf
exbraces.mf
expunct.mf
exrdigit.mf
ex
Hello,
I've done a test. Lilypond seems working with tetex-tiny, but there is
still that ecrm1000 issue. I don't remember clearly what is the status
of this problem .Will you include ecrm1000 in tetex-tiny?
Tomorrow I will try build 2.4CVS against tetex-2.0
Bert
kpathsea: Running mktextfm ecrm10
Hello,
three patches: modified convert-ly, the defaults for dashed/dotted
slurs, and the doc. (Created against HEAD)
Bert
? slur-dash-patch2
Index: Documentation/user/notation.itely
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/lilypond/lilypond/Documentat
Thanks. I'm very happy :-)
However, the best default for \slurDashed will be something else
(smaller period, like 0.8). I'll have to create some test to find the best.
Bert
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mail
Sorry, I think I've made some confusion here, setting HOME different
than the default in cygwin.bat
So I found now that the .texmf directory was created with d-
rights. After setting the drwx rights, updmap works. I don't know what
was ~/.texmf created by.
What errors?
Only the PK-f
I forgot to ask. Should I rebuild lily with the new tetex, before
reporting the errors? Or should they disappear without rebuilding lily?
Bert
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
There are problems with new configuration. When I run updmap:
updmap: no permissions for writing
/cygdrive/d/Berti/.texmf/var/web2c/updmap.log', so no transcript
There was a problem finding a proper place to store configuration data.
The message was:
Directory TEXMFCONFIG=`/cygdrive/d/Berti/.tex
Hmm. texmf.cnf should say
VARTEXFONTS = /var/cache/fonts
and mktex.cnf should say
: ${MT_FEATURES=appendonlydir:varfonts}
Is that so? If pk fonts are still written to the source tree, you may
have found a tetex-3.0 bug. Mats?
Yes, it is so.
What is the value of $TEXMF, and what does
TE
I've installed tetex-3.0.0-1.
This would be the normal way, but lilypond tries to provide a TEXMF
TDS in share/lilypond/x.y.z/. The location of map files changed too
for 3.0, so I've added a fix to CVS (also attached).
Into which CVS? (I've got no attachment)
- PK fonts are generated in /usr/sh
101 - 200 of 278 matches
Mail list logo
