On 12 Aug 2009, at 00:06, joenee...@gmail.com wrote:
In case there is rounding, it is better to check
if (abs (paper_width - line_width - left_margin - right_margin)
1e-6)
Wouldn't it be a good idea to define a name for 1e-6?
--
Dan
___
That reminds me of a problem I once encountered. Aren't accidentals
normally supposed to be cancelled by the next bar line? This one
carries
over, so that the second B flat has no flat printed.
\version 2.12.1
\include english.ly
\relative c'
{
c4 c bf \bar || bf | c1
}
--
Dan
On 8 Aug
On 9 Aug 2009, at 18:21, Mark Polesky wrote:
Dan Eble wrote:
I appreciate your reply. Applying this statement to certain
other figures (e.g. key signature or clef) would indicate a bug.
Does a non-functional bar line differ from those?
I wouldn't apply that statement to other figures
On 9 Aug 2009, at 18:53, David Kastrup wrote:
Dan Eble d...@faithful.be writes:
On 9 Aug 2009, at 18:21, Mark Polesky wrote:
Dan Eble wrote:
I appreciate your reply. Applying this statement to certain
other figures (e.g. key signature or clef) would indicate a bug.
Does a non-functional
Doesn't this mix up meaning and appearance? What will you do when
people come asking for LargeStaff, TinyStaff, LittleGreenStaff (for
Martian music), and so forth?
I'm not saying it isn't useful, but maybe it should be named according
to the purpose it serves rather than how it looks.
On 26 Jul 2009, at 13:41, Joe Neeman wrote:
Please do send me the files. But first, check to see if they give the
same behaviour with current git. I pushed some changes yesterday that
may have helped.
I have a book of 243 scores that could use better vertical spacing.
Are there
On 21 Mar 2009, at 09:32, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
On 3/20/09 9:36 PM, Dan Eble d...@faithful.be wrote:
On 20 Mar 2009, at 14:36, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
I'd recommend
left-margin (which is never violated, i.e. it will always be at
least this
big, but may be bigger if the line
On 20 Mar 2009, at 14:36, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
On 3/20/09 11:42 AM, Mark Polesky markpole...@yahoo.com wrote:
continuation of this thread from lilypond-user:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2009-03/msg00364.html
Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
It would seem to me that it
I have a hymnal that uses a single thick bar line at a mid-measure
line break that coincides with the end of a line of the poem.
It uses a double thick bar line at the end of a song.
Its repeat signs are four dots and a thick line (or two thick lines at
the end of a song). A bidirectional
Please elaborate on unfolded bar numbering. Would that mean that each
bar within a repeated section would have more than one measure number
assigned to it (one per volta)? I'd use that feature, but where you
would fit the bar numbers? Maybe one above the staff, one below, and
then what?
Does anyone know why the variables that control horizontal spacing
(base-shortest-duration, shortest-duration-space, extra-spacing-width)
would have no effect when the page-breaking function is set to ly:page-
turn-breaking? With 2.11, some of my music is spaced incredibly
tightly and I
The 0/0 message occurs in 2.11.59, but not in 2.11.58.
--
Dan
On 28 Sep 2008, at 14:26, Dan Eble wrote:
I'm running the version from http://lilypond.org/web/install/#2.11
which is labeled MacOS X (G3, G4, G5 Macs) 10.3 and newer on
10.5.5 (the latest).
When I get time, I'll try
Just upgraded to 2.11.60 (from 57 maybe?), and got this unusual error.
src/transcriptions/tr8_Les_Rameaux.ly:29:64: warning: barcheck
failed at: 0/0
gf,4 f) bf~ \times 2/3 { bf8 c df } | ef4 r ef, r | af r af 4
Obviously 4 instead of r4 is a typo, but where does 0/0 come from?
Dan Eble [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Obviously 4 instead of r4 is a typo, but where does 0/0 come
from?
When I try only the sample you gave, I've got a 3/4 barcheck error
(not 0/0);
could you post a complete file (or at least one that reproduces the
warning)?
Cheers,
Valentin
:
2008/9/28 Dan Eble [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Here's the whole file for now. It's not that I mind narrowing down
the
problem for you; I just can't do it today. Let me know if you need
a more
restricted example.
when compiling the whole file, I get two 3/4 barchecks warnings, but
no 0/0. Strange
It would be nice to make the amount of swing a context parameter, so
it could be set anywhere from, say, 1:3 to 3:1, rather than being a
fixed 2:1.
This discussion also reminds me of some baroque rhythms printed a8.
b16, which may be played a8.. b32.
--
Dan
On 15 Sep 2008, at 00:17,
On 7 Sep 2008, at 23:08, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 7:13 PM, Dan Eble [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If we go through with this (which I doubt), the handles_ should be a
vector so we get bounds checking.
No argument there, but I don't understand what you mean by which I
0001-std-vector.hh-build-fix.patch
Description: Binary data
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
If we go through with this (which I doubt), the handles_ should be a
vector so we get bounds checking.
No argument there, but I don't understand what you mean by which I
doubt.
1. why is this a music property? Since it is all about contexts, I
think a context property would be better, at
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
I'm not sure whether this has been discussed before: What do you think
of using `c[]' as a shorthand for `\autoBeamOff c \autoBeamOn'?
Currently, `c[]' produces
_
|
|
O
(a note with a beamlet to the left and right), which
%{
I want to insert a different kind of bar line based on whether
repeated music is unfolded or not. In volta format, I want the usual
dotted bars, but in unfolded format, I want double bars.
I have a work-around that uses tags (and abuses the void property)
which I posted to the general
I propose a new kind of autobeaming: beam by slur.
For beam by slur, beams are calculated according to the normal autobeam
rules, then limited by the following two rules:
1. Only slurred notes may be beamed.
2. When the notes spanned by a slur are also spanned by a beam, the
slur is not
801 - 822 of 822 matches
Mail list logo
