Hi,
General question about Staff_performer::acknowledge_audio_element()
given:
Context* c = inf.origin_contexts (this)[0];
string voice;
if (c->is_alias (ly_symbol2scm ("Voice")))
voice = c->id_string ();
... when does
if (c->is_alias (ly_symbol2scm ("Voice")))
e
Hi,
it's been a while since I had time to work with LilyPond but coming
back to it I'm trying to make one tiny adjustment to MIDI output:
specify exact channel (staff/voice contexts).
I need this because, like was mentioned here:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2011-05/msg00165.
On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 12:09:26 +
Bernard Hurley wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 10:34:29AM +, c.m.bryan wrote:
> > Hi, I have an interesting question. I know lilypond is not really
> > meant for playback. HOWEVER :)
> >
> Personally I would like lily to have much more sophisicated midi
On Sun, 2 Jan 2011 15:47:01 +0100
"Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool)" wrote:
> You should consider using a proper logging framework with different
> logging levels.
>
The first thing that jumps out at me is Apache log4cxx. It is a robust
logging framework based on Java log4j. It introduces depende
t warnings and such, but I'll take a look
at a broader solution.
David
>
> On 1/2/11, Graham Percival wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 02:25:57AM -0500, David Santamauro wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, 1 Jan 2011 10:19:18 +
>>> Graham Percival wrot
Hi,
On Sat, 1 Jan 2011 10:19:18 +
Graham Percival wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 09:49:10AM +, Mark Veltzer wrote:
> > - version, progress and general messages which are not error
> > messages should go to stdout and NOT stderr.
>
> Good point; I've added this as
> http://code.google
On Fri, 26 Nov 2010 16:59:26 +0100
Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> BTW, I just realized the Contributor's Guide already contains a nice
> section on engravers:
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/contributor/engraver-tutorial
>
And of course, this is also required reading.
http://lilypo
Hi,
On Fri, 26 Nov 2010 16:59:26 +0100
Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> Am Freitag, 26. November 2010, um 15:48:01 schrieben Sie:
> > a) ... possibly? do something so that my new event-representing
> > symbols are recognized by the parser
>
> No need for that. In d) you create the lilypond symbols/
Reinhold, thanks for the detailed explanation ...
On Fri, 26 Nov 2010 13:30:21 +0100
Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> Am Freitag, 26. November 2010, um 12:26:08 schrieb David Santamauro:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > After browsing the code for a couple weeks, I have a few questio
Greetings,
After browsing the code for a couple weeks, I have a few questions.
First, though, if there is a skeleton Performer, commented thoroughly,
please disregard the rest of this email and point me to it. Otherwise...
What makes up a skeleton performer?
// definition as subclass of "Perfo
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 19:29:07 +
Wols Lists wrote:
> On 13/11/10 16:17, David Santamauro wrote:
> > I want to offer to do it, but I have some intense studying to do. Is
> > this the correct list to ask questions about this. I'm not in
> > inexperienced develop
On Sat, 13 Nov 2010 07:32:06 -0700
Carl Sorensen wrote:
> >>
> >> An easier approach might be to write an engraver
> >
> > Pardon my ignorance, but is this something like what
> > articulate.ly[1] does or are you referring to some deeper, possible
> > c++ level? E.g.,
> >
> > \score {
> > \
Hi Carl,
very interesting information...
On Sat, 13 Nov 2010 03:12:40 -0700
Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
> An easier approach might be to write an engraver
Pardon my ignorance, but is this something like what articulate.ly[1]
does or are you referring to some deeper, possible c++ level? E.g.,
\sc
13 matches
Mail list logo
