* 2013-01-19 18:20 +0100 Ian Hulin:
> On 19/01/13 15:34, Johannes Rohrer wrote:
> > currently the scm/ subdirectory of LilyPond is flat, and all guile
> > modules defined there are immediate submodules of scm. Related
> > modules are not grouped into guile submodules, but m
Dear LilyPond developers,
currently the scm/ subdirectory of LilyPond is flat, and all guile
modules defined there are immediate submodules of scm. Related modules
are not grouped into guile submodules, but marked with a name prefix
(e.g. the framework-* group).
Is this a conscious design deci
* 2013-01-04 20:38 +0100 d...@gnu.org:
> On 2013/01/04 19:32:02, J. Rohrer wrote:
>> [Thus I learned something about contexts today: I would not have
>> naively expected
>>
>>\context { \AlreadyDefinedContext \name NewContext },
>>
>> to actually create a new, independent context, since the c
t with a grob but also with the
> originating engraver instance announcing the grob, and so one can
> indeed figure out the originating context of an announcement _if_ the
> grob is produced from a Voice-level engraver instance.
to write a S
