re perpetuating here (scheme is
always slow and interpreted, C++ is equivalently expressive to these
other languages, etc).
Cheers. No malice intended by my snarky comments above.
--
Julian Squires
___
Lilypond-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
bigloo
etc). I'd love to see lilypond become 100% scheme (or, in my
preference, common lisp, simply for the standard environment... also,
some of the compilers still seem to produce faster code). But I suspect
that would be a rather mammoth undertaking.
Cheers.
--
p://www.paulgraham.com/icad.html
I give the caveat that when I came across the first, I was highly
skeptical, and though I still don't agree entirely with what Graham is
saying, it wasn't until I spent a while writing some serious code in a
few languages more expressive than C++ that I
mailing list discussions
such as this one would be of great benefit. Maybe a section on the
wiki?
Cheers.
--
Julian Squires
___
Lilypond-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 05:35:52AM -0700, Graham Percival wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/dev/lilypond$ grep TODO `find`
> bash: /bin/grep: Argument list too long
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/dev/lilypond$
Try
$ find | xargs grep TODO
instead.
Cheers.
--
Julia
