Graham Percival wrote:
Could you stick the next version of this patch on Reitveld? I
think there's enough interest, and enough opinions on it, that
this would be worthwhile.
I've not changed anything since last post, but here it is:
http://codereview.appspot.com/2226045/
- Mark
Carl Sorensen wrote:
Well, the Notation Reference is supposed to contain all
the information necessary to understand all the notation.
If the information on voices isn't in the Notation
Reference, then we'll need to have links from the NR to
the LM for fundamental operation of commands.
We
Mark Polesky wrote Sunday, September 19, 2010 7:51 AM
Carl Sorensen wrote:
Well, the Notation Reference is supposed to contain all
the information necessary to understand all the notation.
If the information on voices isn't in the Notation
Reference, then we'll need to have links from the
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 06:59:13PM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote:
Graham Percival wrote:
- I don't like the @example; could you use @enumerate
instead?
I agree with Trevor; that would add extra space.
... actually, do we really need the @example (or
@enumerate) ? The image looks
, 18 Sep 2010 11:17:03 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Doc: LM 3.2: Entering voices in the correct order.
---
Documentation/learning/fundamental.itely | 186 +
1 files changed, 160 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/learning/fundamental.itely
b
On 9/18/10 12:23 PM, Mark Polesky markpole...@yahoo.com wrote:
This patch should prevent the type of confusion that
leads to bug #45:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=45
Comments/objections? Okay to push?
I like the documentation, as it clarifies things. But I think
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 7:23 PM, Mark Polesky markpole...@yahoo.com wrote:
This patch should prevent the type of confusion that
leads to bug #45:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=45
Hmm.
- I don't like the @example; could you use @enumerate instead?
- delete the The
Mark Polesky wrote Saturday, September 18, 2010 7:23 PM
This patch should prevent the type of confusion that
leads to bug #45:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=45
Comments/objections? Okay to push?
I like it; much improved! I (more or less[1]) agree
with Graham's
On 9/18/10 7:59 PM, Mark Polesky markpole...@yahoo.com wrote:
Carl, it looks like you're outnumbered wrt to LM vs. NR, but
feel free to protest against us masses, we'll listen.
Well, the Notation Reference is supposed to contain all the information
necessary to understand all the notation.
