2009/11/17 Han-Wen Nienhuys :
> My worry is that this might not work correctly for
>
> \tweak #'bound-details #'foo #'bar #22
>
> If that works, please ignore my comment.
No, that can't work, since the level of nesting varies. I don't see
it as a problem though since users are encouraged to over
My worry is that this might not work correctly for
\tweak #'bound-details #'foo #'bar #22
If that works, please ignore my comment.
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 11:03 PM, Neil Puttock wrote:
> 2009/11/14 Han-Wen Nienhuys :
>
>> Shouldnt this be something recursive? I thought properties could nest
>>
2009/11/14 Han-Wen Nienhuys :
> Shouldnt this be something recursive? I thought properties could nest
> beyond one level.
I don't see how it can be, unless you mean building the property alist
given the list of symbols and a value to set.
The problem with the current behaviour is that it's only
> Please review this patch:
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/152127/show
Very nice!
Werner
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 9:41 PM, Neil Puttock wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> Please review this patch:
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/152127/show
>
Shouldnt this be something recursive? I thought properties could nest
beyond one level.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - han...@xs4all.nl - http://www.xs4all
Hi everybody,
Please review this patch:
http://codereview.appspot.com/152127/show
Cheers,
Neil
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel