Re: [PATCH] COPYING rewrite to clarify licensing

2009-09-22 Thread Graham Percival
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 07:50:08PM +0200, Joseph Wakeling wrote: > Graham Percival wrote: > > ok, committed, and I dealt with the copying.documentation thing. > > Thanks! I've attached a small tweak to add front/back cover text > mentions, for you to take or leave as you please. ok, committed.

Re: [PATCH] COPYING rewrite to clarify licensing

2009-09-22 Thread Joseph Wakeling
Graham Percival wrote: > ok, committed, and I dealt with the copying.documentation thing. Thanks! I've attached a small tweak to add front/back cover text mentions, for you to take or leave as you please. Best wishes, -- Joe From 7bdfa348918fab245f1130de988fbf3dc6ef49b4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00

Re: [PATCH] COPYING rewrite to clarify licensing

2009-09-22 Thread Graham Percival
ok, committed, and I dealt with the copying.documentation thing. Cheers, - Graham On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 04:04:43PM +0200, Joseph Wakeling wrote: > Following the earlier discussion with Graham and others, this patch > slightly rewrites the COPYING file to clarify the Lilypond licensing > situati

[PATCH] COPYING rewrite to clarify licensing

2009-09-20 Thread Joseph Wakeling
license. Best wishes, -- Joe From d1ee19e7d7dd10d0504ebec2a621d675087f0f70 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joseph Wakeling Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 15:58:09 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] COPYING rewrite to clarify licensing. * Text is closer to FSF guidelines and explicitly states that Lilypond is