Re: [PATCH] Docs: IR 4 Scheme functions: Improve docstrings.

2009-08-27 Thread Neil Puttock
2009/8/24 Mark Polesky : > how's this then? That's much better, thank you. :) - "Return the definition of @var{name} (a symbol) within" + 2, 0, 0, (SCM context, SCM grob), + "Return the definition of @var{grob} (a symbol) within" You could argue that this should stay

Re: [PATCH] Docs: IR 4 Scheme functions: Improve docstrings.

2009-08-23 Thread Mark Polesky
y Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 17:33:23 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Docs: IR 4 Scheme functions: Improve docstrings. --- lily/context-scheme.cc | 57 +-- 1 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) diff --git a/lily/context-scheme.cc b/lily/context-scheme.

Re: [PATCH] Docs: IR 4 Scheme functions: Improve docstrings.

2009-08-23 Thread Neil Puttock
2009/8/23 Mark Polesky : > Okay to apply? No, since you've changed the names of function arguments while leaving the original names in the body of the function: - 2, 0, 0, (SCM context, SCM name), - "Return the definition of @var{name} (a symbol) within" + 2, 0, 0, (SCM

[PATCH] Docs: IR 4 Scheme functions: Improve docstrings.

2009-08-23 Thread Mark Polesky
Okay to apply? Thanks. - Mark From 29f3105e26c3dfdde1f265a93e4392e79ce3aeb2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark Polesky Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 12:08:36 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Docs: IR 4 Scheme functions: Improve docstrings. --- lily/context-scheme.cc | 39