Le 20/10/2012 20:33, Francisco Vila disait :
2012/10/20 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
If it is ok with people, I'd propose the following course in order to
get the ball rolling again:
I'll merge stable/2.16 into translation. That should be unproblematic.
Then I'll merge translation into
Jean-Charles Malahieude lily...@orange.fr writes:
Le 20/10/2012 20:33, Francisco Vila disait :
2012/10/20 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
If it is ok with people, I'd propose the following course in order to
get the ball rolling again:
I'll merge stable/2.16 into translation. That should be
Le 21/10/2012 13:15, David Kastrup disait :
Jean-Charles Malahieude lily...@orange.fr writes:
That's what I feared since the freeze: having to maintain two sets of
translations.
I think that we will likely leave the stable branch behind soon with
regard to documentation maintenance. Our
Jean-Charles Malahieude lily...@orange.fr writes:
Le 21/10/2012 13:15, David Kastrup disait :
So I really think we should move translations over, and live with the
documentation of 2.16 being the best we could make it for 2.16.
Do we translators first update what you just merged from
2012/10/21 Jean-Charles Malahieude lily...@orange.fr:
So I really think we should move translations over, and live with the
documentation of 2.16 being the best we could make it for 2.16.
Do we translators first update what you just merged from stable? I'm on it
at the present (my wife is
