Werner LEMBERG escreveu:
>> Can you push this change after adding it to one of the markup
>> regtests?
>
> Done. Shall I prepare an entry for the NEWS file also?
I think the feature is too minor to put in the NEWS file, but if you think
otherwise
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Can you push this change after adding it to one of the markup
> regtests?
Done. Shall I prepare an entry for the NEWS file also?
Werner
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-deve
Werner LEMBERG escreveu:
>> another option is to use fold-left or fold-right (srfi-1 IIRC) to do
>> the list looping
>
> Ok, here's another try. However, look how `result' is set in the
> first `let' block -- what about adding safe-car and safe-cdr (on the
> C++ level) which don't signal an erro
> another option is to use fold-left or fold-right (srfi-1 IIRC) to do
> the list looping
Ok, here's another try. However, look how `result' is set in the
first `let' block -- what about adding safe-car and safe-cdr (on the
C++ level) which don't signal an error if its argument is the empty
lis
> > Good question. Perhaps `\concat { f i }' should be really
> > identical to `fi', contrary to \line with word-space set to
> > zero...
>
> It's your call. You could try to inspect the arguments, and if they
> are strings or simple markups, concatenate the strings.
OK, here it is. Please com
> This is unschemey.
Ha! It took me *hours* to get this small snippet right :-(
> I think it's better to use a
> a functional approach.
Will have a look. However, my solution works quite fine, and I
probably don't have enough time to get it `right'.
Werner
Werner LEMBERG escreveu:
>>> Good question. Perhaps `\concat { f i }' should be really
>>> identical to `fi', contrary to \line with word-space set to
>>> zero...
>> It's your call. You could try to inspect the arguments, and if they
>> are strings or simple markups, concatenate the strings.
>
>
> I've done a closer look now, and I see that your suggestion doesn't
> work that well -- make-line-markup accepts only a single argument,
> while I need to process a list of markups...
Please forget that. I was confused.
Werner
___
lilypond-dev
> >>> Isn't this what my command does? What do you mean with
> >>> `efficiently'?
> >> I mean: use make-line-markup , prepending '((word-space . 0.0))
> >> onto the property list.
> >
> > Example code, please. I had the impression that changing
> > word-space is a global operation...
>
> each ma
Werner LEMBERG escreveu:
BTW: What about ligatures? What should \concat { f i } produce?
Good question. Perhaps `\concat { f i }' should be really identical
to `fi', contrary to \line with word-space set to zero...
Han-Wen?
It's your call. You could try to inspect the arguments, and if they
> BTW: What about ligatures? What should \concat { f i } produce?
Good question. Perhaps `\concat { f i }' should be really identical
to `fi', contrary to \line with word-space set to zero...
Han-Wen?
Werner
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lil
On Saturday 11 November 2006 23:53, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Werner LEMBERG escreveu:
> > All markup commands which accept more than a single markup put spaces
> > inbetween. However, sometimes this is not useful (for example, just
> > look at the bad appearance of the E=mc² -- there is an incorr
Werner LEMBERG escreveu:
Isn't this what my command does? What do you mean with
`efficiently'?
I mean: use make-line-markup , prepending '((word-space . 0.0)) onto
the property list.
Example code, please. I had the impression that changing word-space
is a global operation...
each markup ge
> > Isn't this what my command does? What do you mean with
> > `efficiently'?
>
> I mean: use make-line-markup , prepending '((word-space . 0.0)) onto
> the property list.
Example code, please. I had the impression that changing word-space
is a global operation...
Werner
___
Werner LEMBERG escreveu:
I thus suggest a command \concat which does the same as \line but
without inserting whitespace:
Isn't this more efficiently done by setting word-space to 0.0 and
interpreting as a line?
Isn't this what my command does? What do you mean with `efficiently'?
I mean: u
> > I thus suggest a command \concat which does the same as \line but
> > without inserting whitespace:
>
> Isn't this more efficiently done by setting word-space to 0.0 and
> interpreting as a line?
Isn't this what my command does? What do you mean with `efficiently'?
Werner
___
Werner LEMBERG escreveu:
All markup commands which accept more than a single markup put spaces
inbetween. However, sometimes this is not useful (for example, just
look at the bad appearance of the E=mc² -- there is an incorrect space
before the superscript 2.
I thus suggest a command \concat wh
All markup commands which accept more than a single markup put spaces
inbetween. However, sometimes this is not useful (for example, just
look at the bad appearance of the E=mc² -- there is an incorrect space
before the superscript 2.
I thus suggest a command \concat which does the same as \line
18 matches
Mail list logo
