Re: 13.51 regtests

2011-02-24 Thread Trevor Daniels
Francisco Vila wrote Wednesday, February 23, 2011 6:38 PM 2011/2/23 Phil Holmes : Another change I don't understand. Although I don't understand much about regtests, this difference could show that printing order of objects in the same layer (with the same value of the layer property) is

Re: 13.51 regtests

2011-02-23 Thread Graham Percival
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 05:18:05PM -, Phil Holmes wrote: > TBH, there are so many changes on the official regtest page > (http://lilypond.org/test/v2.13.51-1/compare-v2.13.50-1/index.html) > that it's not feasible to do a good comparison. I count approximately 150 changed regtests -- and don't

Re: 13.51 regtests

2011-02-23 Thread Francisco Vila
2011/2/23 Phil Holmes : > Another change I don't understand. Although I don't understand much about regtests, this difference could show that printing order of objects in the same layer (with the same value of the layer property) is indeterminate, therefore you could try again and obtain a differe

Re: 13.51 regtests

2011-02-23 Thread Keith OHara
Phil Holmes philholmes.net> writes: > > Comparing 13.51 to 13.50 with the official regtest checker shows a plethora > of minor changes - clearly something in the spacing engine has changed > enough to flags lots of errors. Horizontal spacing changed for issue 1229. These all look good to me

Re: 13.51 regtests

2011-02-23 Thread Phil Holmes
"Phil Holmes" wrote in message news:ik3ha9$33v$1...@dough.gmane.org... "Phil Holmes" wrote in message news:ik3fgn$ntp$1...@dough.gmane.org... Comparing 13.51 to 13.50 with the official regtest checker shows a plethora of minor changes - clearly something in the spacing engine has changed enoug

Re: 13.51 regtests

2011-02-23 Thread Phil Holmes
"Phil Holmes" wrote in message news:ik3ha9$33v$1...@dough.gmane.org... "Phil Holmes" wrote in message news:ik3fgn$ntp$1...@dough.gmane.org... Comparing 13.51 to 13.50 with the official regtest checker shows a plethora of minor changes - clearly something in the spacing engine has changed enoug

Re: 13.51 regtests

2011-02-23 Thread Phil Holmes
"Phil Holmes" wrote in message news:ik3fgn$ntp$1...@dough.gmane.org... Comparing 13.51 to 13.50 with the official regtest checker shows a plethora of minor changes - clearly something in the spacing engine has changed enough to flags lots of errors. I was looking at theses regtests as light r

13.51 regtests

2011-02-23 Thread Phil Holmes
Comparing 13.51 to 13.50 with the official regtest checker shows a plethora of minor changes - clearly something in the spacing engine has changed enough to flags lots of errors. I was looking at theses regtests as light relief from my pixel comparator, which shows 277 changed images (from 13.4