Re: 2.13.56 regtests

2011-04-01 Thread Phil Holmes
Has anyone looked at these differences in note placement? Were they deliberate? If they're not, then they'd have to count as a regression. -- Phil Holmes Bug Squad ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org

Re: 2.13.56 regtests

2011-04-01 Thread Graham Percival
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 09:17:10AM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote: Has anyone looked at these differences in note placement? Were they deliberate? If they're not, then they'd have to count as a regression. I glanced at it initially and saw nothing bad, but when there's animation as well, it really

Re: 2.13.56 regtests

2011-03-31 Thread Phil Holmes
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote in message news:... The regtests on the website look fine, although some of the text items have been moved. On my pixel comparator, I think every single regtest is different. It looks like a number of elements, including noteheads and time sigs, have

Re: 2.13.56 regtests

2011-03-31 Thread Phil Holmes
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote in message news:in1e3s$to9$1...@dough.gmane.org... Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote in message news:... The regtests on the website look fine, although some of the text items have been moved. On my pixel comparator, I think every single regtest is