Phil Holmes-2 wrote:
>
>
> If you right-click, properties, details, the version number of the
> executable is wrong.
>
i didn't check that - you're right!
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/2.13.61-Windows-version-wrong-tp31523709p315240
- Original Message -
From: "-Eluze"
To:
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2011 3:05 PM
Subject: Re: 2.13.61 Windows version wrong
Phil Holmes-2 wrote:
The 2.13.61 release for Windows reports an internal version number of
2.13.60.
under windows vista it's ok (tagline, fil
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 02:44:20PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
> The 2.13.61 release for Windows reports an internal version number
> of 2.13.60.
I noticed that the VERSION hadn't been updated after building
packages, so I cancelled the build, changed the number, then
started it again. That general
Phil Holmes-2 wrote:
>
> The 2.13.61 release for Windows reports an internal version number of
> 2.13.60.
>
under windows vista it's ok (tagline, file-info [snippet 197] and the log).
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/2.13.61-Windows-version-wrong-tp
The 2.13.61 release for Windows reports an internal version number of
2.13.60.
--
Phil Holmes
Bug Squad
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
