Re: 2.15.41 Regtests

2012-07-09 Thread Janek WarchoĊ‚
On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Phil Holmes em...@philholmes.net wrote: http://www.philholmes.net/lilypond/regtestresults/ Please look at it and see if these are intended changes. beam-beat-grouping - no idea if its intended, but new version looks better than old one to me changed forte seems

Re: 2.15.41 Regtests

2012-07-09 Thread Keith OHara
Phil Holmes email at philholmes.net writes: Please look at it and see if these are intended changes. The changes to slurs across line-breaks are intended. I don't know what caused the changes to slurs, probably the Stem/Flag work, but I've updated issue 1327. The stem failing to meet the

Re: 2.15.41 Regtests

2012-07-09 Thread David Kastrup
Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net writes: Phil Holmes email at philholmes.net writes: Please look at it and see if these are intended changes. The changes to slurs across line-breaks are intended. I don't know what caused the changes to slurs, probably the Stem/Flag work, but I've updated

2.15.41 Regtests

2012-07-08 Thread Phil Holmes
I've been doing a bit of work with my pixel comparator, and now have a mechanism to generate a web page from commented results. Running the checker on 15.41 versus 15.40 gives about 100 changed files, most of which are subtle changes, some of which come from a changed forte mark. I've got a

Re: 2.15.41 Regtests

2012-07-08 Thread David Kastrup
Phil Holmes em...@philholmes.net writes: I've been doing a bit of work with my pixel comparator, and now have a mechanism to generate a web page from commented results. Running the checker on 15.41 versus 15.40 gives about 100 changed files, most of which are subtle changes, some of which