Warning. I this message, Why don't we does not mean do it, you
slave. It means just asking do you think it's a worthwhile idea?
The thread about usability and promoting has forked too much and my
thoughts are somewhat related to both. I am crossposting to hear users
feedback also, sorry for that.
- Original Message -
From: Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com
To: LilyPond-User list lilypond-u...@gnu.org; LilyPond-Devel list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2013 5:24 PM
Subject: A thought on Windows Experience (was: useability, promoting, etc)
Warning. I
On 04/12/13 17:24, Francisco Vila wrote:
Warning. I this message, Why don't we does not mean do it, you
slave. It means just asking do you think it's a worthwhile idea?
The thread about usability and promoting has forked too much and my
thoughts are somewhat related to both. I am crossposting
I am willing to look at improving the Windows experience, although this
would need to wait until my degree finishes next Summer. However,
there's
one thing I don't know: what should happen when you double-click a .ly
file
in Explorer: open an editor or compile the file? And if the former,
2013/12/4 Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net:
For me, I'd say that we should not install Frescobaldi as a pre-requisite of
running Lily on Windows. I'm a heavy Windows user, and would not want
another program installed by default.
But you _already_ have another program installed by default: the
From: Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2013 6:16 PM
I am willing to look at improving the Windows experience, although this
would need to wait until my degree finishes next Summer. However,
there's one thing I don't know: what should happen when you
double-click
