On 2010/07/28 14:09:54, c_sorensen_byu.edu wrote:
>> On 2010/07/27 20:16:58, Neil Puttock wrote:
>>> user-include ?
>> How about custom-definitions or user-definitions (no, sounds too
much
>> like it defines users)?
> How about --user-startup or --custom-startup?
How about --extra-init, or --in
On 7/28/10 4:49 AM, "Ian Hulin" wrote:
> Hi Reinhold,
> On 28/07/10 01:43, reinhold.kainho...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Reviewers: Neil Puttock,
>>
>>
>> http://codereview.appspot.com/1901042/diff/2001/3001
>> File ly/init.ly (right):
>>
>> http://codereview.appspot.com/1901042/diff/2001/3001#newcod
Hi Reinhold,
On 28/07/10 01:43, reinhold.kainho...@gmail.com wrote:
Reviewers: Neil Puttock,
http://codereview.appspot.com/1901042/diff/2001/3001
File ly/init.ly (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/1901042/diff/2001/3001#newcode26
ly/init.ly:26: #(if (ly:get-option 'user-init)
On 2010/07/27
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 12:43:08AM +, reinhold.kainho...@gmail.com wrote:
> On 2010/07/27 20:16:58, Neil Puttock wrote:
>> user-include ?
>
> Hmm, actually, I don't like either user-init (indicates it's part of the
> init sequence and has similar uses as the --init command line option;
> also i
Reviewers: Neil Puttock,
http://codereview.appspot.com/1901042/diff/2001/3001
File ly/init.ly (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/1901042/diff/2001/3001#newcode26
ly/init.ly:26: #(if (ly:get-option 'user-init)
On 2010/07/27 20:16:58, Neil Puttock wrote:
user-include ?
Hmm, actually, I don
http://codereview.appspot.com/1901042/diff/2001/3001
File ly/init.ly (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/1901042/diff/2001/3001#newcode26
ly/init.ly:26: #(if (ly:get-option 'user-init)
user-include ?
http://codereview.appspot.com/1901042/diff/2001/3001#newcode27
ly/init.ly:27: (begin
remove
