On 2011/12/06 12:07:03, mike_apollinemike.com wrote:
Good to see you back on the list!
Cheers mate. :) I'm afraid I'm only passing through temporarily though.
Hopefully will get back into the swing of things after Christmas.
Cheers,
Neil
http://codereview.appspot.com/5440049/
>> can you have a look at issue #460 in case you find some time? This
>> is neither urgent nor really important, but you've got a feeling of
>> this bar stuff meanwhile, I presume...
>
> Not a prob!
You are amazingly fast, faster than Han-Wen at his best time :-)
Thanks a lot!
Werner
PS
Le Dec 6, 2011 à 1:04 PM, n.putt...@gmail.com a écrit :
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/5440049/diff/9003/lily/bar-number-engraver.cc
> File lily/bar-number-engraver.cc (right):
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/5440049/diff/9003/lily/bar-number-engraver.cc#newcode156
> lily/bar-number-engrave
http://codereview.appspot.com/5440049/diff/9003/lily/bar-number-engraver.cc
File lily/bar-number-engraver.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5440049/diff/9003/lily/bar-number-engraver.cc#newcode156
lily/bar-number-engraver.cc:156: scm_string_concatenate (scm_list_2
(scm_number_to_string (
Le Dec 6, 2011 à 12:29 PM, Werner LEMBERG a écrit :
>
> Mike,
>
>
> can you have a look at issue #460 in case you find some time? This is
> neither urgent nor really important, but you've got a feeling of this
> bar stuff meanwhile, I presume...
>
>
>Werner
Not a prob!
Cheers,
MS
Mike,
can you have a look at issue #460 in case you find some time? This is
neither urgent nor really important, but you've got a feeling of this
bar stuff meanwhile, I presume...
Werner
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
ht
Passes make and make check
James
http://codereview.appspot.com/5440049/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On Nov 30, 2011, at 6:29 AM, k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
> Now it looks quite good, and still works great.
> C'est si bon.
> Is maith é sin.
> Smashing, old chap.
>
>
Thanks!
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/5440049/diff/11010/lily/bar-number-engraver.cc
> File lily/bar-number-engraver.cc (ri
Now it looks quite good, and still works great.
C'est si bon.
Is maith é sin.
Smashing, old chap.
http://codereview.appspot.com/5440049/diff/11010/lily/bar-number-engraver.cc
File lily/bar-number-engraver.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5440049/diff/11010/lily/bar-number-engraver.cc#
Passes Make and Make check
James
http://codereview.appspot.com/5440049/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On 29/11/11 18:26, Keith OHara wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 04:08:52 -0800, wrote:
>
>> I'll just say to all you haters of `renvoi'
> No no. I love "renvoi". You were just using it wrongly, to refer
> to the action of entering an alternative ending.
How about "diversion" (in the sense of traffic
On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 04:08:52 -0800, wrote:
I'll just say to all you haters of `renvoi'
No no. I love "renvoi". You were just using it wrongly,
to refer to the action of entering an alternative ending.
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel
On Nov 29, 2011, at 1:20 PM, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
> On Nov 29, 2011, at 1:08 PM, mts...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>>
>> The only problem that remains is that the display-lily-tests shows a
>> one-space increase in the new output. I've made the string rendered for
>> AlternativeEvent "", but i
David Kastrup writes:
> "m...@apollinemike.com" writes:
>
>> On Nov 29, 2011, at 1:13 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>>> mts...@gmail.com writes:
>>>
I'll just say to all you haters of `renvoi' that:
--) There is no English term that I know of that succinctly expresses
the ide
"m...@apollinemike.com" writes:
> On Nov 29, 2011, at 1:13 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> mts...@gmail.com writes:
>>
>>> I'll just say to all you haters of `renvoi' that:
>>>
>>> --) There is no English term that I know of that succinctly expresses
>>> the idea of "being sent back to something.
On Nov 29, 2011, at 1:08 PM, mts...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> The only problem that remains is that the display-lily-tests shows a
> one-space increase in the new output. I've made the string rendered for
> AlternativeEvent "", but is there any way just to get the display method
> to ignore it (meani
On Nov 29, 2011, at 1:13 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> mts...@gmail.com writes:
>
>> I'll just say to all you haters of `renvoi' that:
>>
>> --) There is no English term that I know of that succinctly expresses
>> the idea of "being sent back to something."
>
> "returned"
>
I meant noun. And ev
mts...@gmail.com writes:
> I'll just say to all you haters of `renvoi' that:
>
> --) There is no English term that I know of that succinctly expresses
> the idea of "being sent back to something."
"returned"
--
David Kastrup
___
lilypond-devel maili
I'll just say to all you haters of `renvoi' that:
--) There is no English term that I know of that succinctly expresses
the idea of "being sent back to something." And, as new terms are
invented out of necessity, I took the liberty to invent one here with
`renvoi,' which Jankélévitch (musicologi
Passes Make and make check just gives me
--snip--
/home/jlowe/lilypond-git/input/regression/display-lily-tests.log
@@ -13,6 +13,9 @@
Test 106 unequal: NOT A BUG.
in = \transpose c d { c d }
out = { d e }
+Test 111 unequal: .
+in = \repeat volta 2 { c4 d } \alternative { { c d } { e f } }
+
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 19:54:42 -0800, wrote:
http://codereview.appspot.com/5440049/diff/1/lily/bar-number-engraver.cc#newcode38
lily/bar-number-engraver.cc:38: int renvoi_number_;
maybe "alternative_number_"
Isn't there already a counter for that somewhere?
Probably the letters /should/ be base
Works nicely.
I'm inspired to name some variables in Irish now! And, I'll be sure the
names are misleadingly related, but critically distinct, from the
conceptual contents of the variable.
http://codereview.appspot.com/5440049/diff/1/lily/bar-number-engraver.cc
File lily/bar-number-engraver.cc
Thanks for taking this on. I sense that this is a step in the direction
of helping LilyPond really understand codas and segnos.
But the terminology is unclear for this musically unsophisticated user.
And I'm not sure I really understand how it all works.
Thanks,
Carl
http://codereview.appsp
Reviewers: ,
Message:
I'm not sure if this is the best way to go about it, but it seems to get
the job done!
Cheers,
MS
Description:
Allows for automatic renumbering of measure numbers at volta repeats.
Please review this at http://codereview.appspot.com/5440049/
Affected files:
M lily/bar-
24 matches
Mail list logo
