Re: Ancient repeat sign

2022-02-06 Thread Benkő Pál
Hi Dan, Dan Eble ezt írta (időpont: 2022. febr. 6., V, 21:32): > > https://www.pinterest.ca/pin/560909328587237881/ > > The sections of this work seem to be separated with a kind of repeat sign. > > A :|||: B :|||: C :||: D :|: > > Q. Do I understand correctly that this is performed

Re: Ancient repeat sign

2022-02-06 Thread Jürgen Reuter
Hi, I have to confess that I have not seen this notational sign before, therefore I am not really sure. But I do not think that it represents a repeat sign in the modern sense. It looks more like an annotation / meta information to the divisio. Specifically, my guess is that

Re: Ancient repeat sign

2022-02-06 Thread David Kastrup
Dan Eble writes: > https://www.pinterest.ca/pin/560909328587237881/ > > The sections of this work seem to be separated with a kind of repeat sign. > > A :|||: B :|||: C :||: D :|: > > Q. Do I understand correctly that this is performed AAA BBB CCD? > > Q. Is this the most obvious way

Ancient repeat sign

2022-02-06 Thread Dan Eble
https://www.pinterest.ca/pin/560909328587237881/ The sections of this work seem to be separated with a kind of repeat sign. A :|||: B :|||: C :||: D :|: Q. Do I understand correctly that this is performed AAA BBB CCD? Q. Is this the most obvious way to code it? { \repeat