Carl Sorensen writes:
> On 2/10/12 12:52 PM, "David Kastrup" wrote:
>>
>>Sure thing. When this will be going on countdown, I was also going to
>>copy it to the user list. I also plan on mentioning it in the next
>>LilyPond Report (no idea about when I'll be working seriously on that,
>>hopeful
On 2/10/12 12:52 PM, "David Kastrup" wrote:
>Graham Percival writes:
>
>> On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 08:16:53PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
>>> gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
>>>
>>> > However, there is clearly no desire to
>>> > actually create that two-line patch, so I guess that removing
>>>s
Graham Percival writes:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 08:16:53PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
>> gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
>>
>> > However, there is clearly no desire to
>> > actually create that two-line patch, so I guess that removing support is
>> > the thing to do.
>>
>> Again: I don't hav
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 08:16:53PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
> gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
>
> > However, there is clearly no desire to
> > actually create that two-line patch, so I guess that removing support is
> > the thing to do.
>
> Again: I don't have a clue about the involved work.
gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
> I have mixed feelings about this patch. Given that adding osx 10.4 ppc
> support is a two-line patch -- smaller than this one! -- it feels a bit
> weird to move ahead with this. However, there is clearly no desire to
> actually create that two-line patch, so I
I have mixed feelings about this patch. Given that adding osx 10.4 ppc
support is a two-line patch -- smaller than this one! -- it feels a bit
weird to move ahead with this. However, there is clearly no desire to
actually create that two-line patch, so I guess that removing support is
the thing
